On a small scale, a functional representation of a plane's cockpit could be built inside of an anechoic chamber, which could then be tested against a bunch of electronic devices. I could see being able to gain some knowledge from this, but DavidWizard is right — the real world presents many other variables.

Either any small, reliable econo-box, or any small, freshly-leased German car. The former for the beach rats, the latter for the gold-diggers.

now that you mention it, I've gone through two girls that drove Neons. they really were easy.

My girlfriend drives an '08 GT convertible 5-speed. Objectively, she's pretty hot. Also objectively, the pretentious levels run high with her (unless you're me, family, or a close friend).

Remember that the aluminum and steel bodywork of the plane will attenuate RF dramatically — it will have as hard a time going from inside to out as it will outside to in.

Lab simulations generally give an idea as to what will happen, but policy changes of this type will never be enacted without real-world testing.

Back in my day, if you knew how to work on one 6-cylinder BMW, you pretty much knew how to work on all of them.

After serving 8 years in the Air Force as an ATCALS/radio/weather technician and now an electrical engineer, I can absolutely, 100% positively reassure everyone that today's electronic devices will do zero to the plane's instrumentation and communication equipment. All aviation-related communication equipment uses VHF…

I always thought the roof scoop was to prevent damage to the manifold and keep the floor pan intact

Are you shitting me? STFU and take my money NOW!

I used to pass by the Mercedes-Benz plant near Tuscaloosa all the time, and once I saw an R-Class cruising around I20 in full camouflage. Pretty cool stuff considering how backwoodsy that area is — the MB plant is actually in the middle of a lot of nothing, about half an hour outside of ol' T-town.

This forum just seems to be full of basement neckbeards, as in the meme "TOO UGLY, WOULDN'T BANG". It's a douchebag move to put her in the pic, but she's hot.

does it really matter what Chevy calls their NASCAR car? it'll be a tube-framed fiberglass shell that's shaped and equipped exactly like the other brands' cars.

maybe The new iPad.

Definitely an underrated classic. Selenium!

Guess we'll never go back to using stock cars in stock car racing.

I seem to recall that the Boxter was about $39k brand new in '97.

Sounds expensive and difficult to fix.

Each Bentley EXP 9 will weigh as much as the orphanage that was sacrificed in order to manufacture the car.

I guess maybe it's because I'm in America, but I still think the Fiesta is a damn cool-looking little car. Then again, I'm so tired of the swaths of lumbering SUVs hauling around no more than one 115-lb woman and a purse.