starrcr
Melanin Monroe
starrcr

She does. The fact that she’s so vague about who said this to her causes enough confusion that people are actually wondering if someone from Marvel said this to her. Might not have been what she meant, and she may not have done it purposely, but the way that it’s worded doesn’t make it clear enough that she’s talking

It’s probably the latter, but she makes it sound like the former, that’s why the statement is so weird. It’s way out of line with where Marvel has been going in terms of representation.

Maybe not. This interview was part of the promotion Charlie’s Angels after all, I don’t think she’d attach herself to such a big franchise if she was done with that kind of thing, when she could just do indies forever. Enough time has passed that she might feel differently about a higher profile. Besides that Marvel’s

I doubt it. Ike was tossed on his ass in 2015, before she started dating women publicly

Makes perfect sense if you’re cynical enough to believe that this is her attempt to raise her profile back to where it was in the Twilight days. Considering that Marvel is the only one she named-dropped here, it may very well be an underhanded way to score a role as a Marvel hero via PR, or at the very least be

I don’t think that they actually are correct though. Disney has tried to be more outwardly supportive of the LGBT community in recent years, and Marvel has been working overtime to course correct its blatant representation issues (just look at the lineup of The Eternals).

You are starting to see genuine craziness from some of them on Splinter.

5% is still a pretty high margin of error though. That doesn’t mean that any particular candidate’s numbers are higher - they could be lower - but I think this stems from Tulsi whining on twitter trying to get the rules changed so she can qualify for the next debate.

Tony Tig has referred to himself as the “Jay-Z of the West Coast

Yeah, this is why national polls are generally useless, that high of a margin of error means they didn’t poll enough people, (only 800 according to the report on the website, and these results account only for 298 registered Dems or Dem leaning voters) so these results are wildly inaccurate.

I’ve already addressed this:

From the article:

He literally passed more amendments than any of his 400+ colleagues during his 12 years in the House.

The vision he has, though... the way it was edited, it barely fit into Ultron, though... it would have made sense anywhere else too, including earlier in the film.

The truth is likely somewhere in the middle. Marvel’s statement dictates what it would mean if there is no deal. Sony’s statement is an attempt to smooth that over and hint that they’re still willing to deal. The backlash Sony has been getting over the last few days let them know where they stand, so they had to try

They wouldn’t be able to mention anything that happened in the MCU movies, or any of the characters from the MCU movies. That would hurt the narrative a whole hell of a lot, unless they’re going to reboot. And if they’re going to reboot, there’s very little chance of them building a billion dollar franchise on their

If Sony could handle live action Spider-Man movies on their own, they wouldn’t have needed Disney to bail them out in the first place. I think their quick response to this story shows that they realized that no one trusts them to make a live action SM movie on their own, and most people don’t even want a live action SM

How Patty Jenkins was treated was absolutely down to Perlmutter, pretty much everything wrong with phase 1 and 2 is, (like it being so white-male centric, due to the “creative committee” headed by Perlmutter) we would’ve had Black Panther and Black Widow movies in phase 1 if Feige had had his way. When Thor 2 was