might as well vote for trump using this brainless logic. what, he doesn’t pass your purity test? gaw i guess nothing’s good enough for you crybabies

sorry sport, social democrats are pinko commies now. i don’t make the rules.

you realize that there are distinct differences between aoc and manchin right? have you ever tried not being an idiot shitlib for like 3 seconds? if you hate progressives vote republican or kill yourself or something, this is not working out.

not sure if you’re familiar with the concept of unbiased if you think that accurately describes the economist lol

the opposition has no popular mandate whatsoever and the international community has been openly conspiring to overthrow venezuela for almost 20 years. this is not a secret, you’d have to be incredibly ignorant or a malicious apparatchik not to acknowledge this. does being The Adult In The Room™ absolutely require…

this is weird, incomprehensible #resistance gibberish. aren’t you the russia bot putin puppet by uncritically supporting donald trump’s foreign policy goals?

it kinda does though. it’s easy to draw conclusions based on the headlines but if you read any deeper than that it gets a bit more complicated. it’s common, for instance, to name the people like lopez and caprile as innocent opposition leaders barred from the democratic process because maduro is an authoritarian…

what i would do if i was you is look at the composition of recent centrist administrations (obama, clinton) and what their agenda was and how effective they were in prosecuting it. clinton was really effective at gutting the safety net and creating the world’s most imprisoned population but whether this is good…

pls refer to him by his full name Actual Crackhead Aaron Sorkin

an uppercut does not result in the same damage as a knee strike, no

really weird and yucky to infer the weavers were the bad guys in the ruby ridge incident imo

you’re not defending anything tho you were just monologuing on a website. you’ve staked out the least courageous position possible and are milking it like you marched with king or something. have some perspective lol

the appeal to grieving parents with murdered children obviously fits any definition of maudlin. you did a good snappy one liner (epic) instead of 2 fat paragraphs of ugly crying which is commendable.

i’m just critiquing your performance, has nothing to do with politics. it is sentimental, obviously. don’t lie to me on the internet. it’s also bloviating, pearl clutching, garment rending, self righteous and obnoxiously self sucking. it’s just a lot all at once. 

tbh give me gay frogs and real men who bleed hot blood or whatever over these outrageously maudlin aaron sorkin monologues pls wow

if you have to resort to bizarre analogies and outright lies to paint the guy as rapey maybe you’re overreaching a lil eh

they’re a good band and all but goddamn what a dull piece of music. makes the 12 year old in me that’s excited about a new tool album simmer down quite a bit.

idk, the shrill, self-righteous and embarrassingly partisan insistence on its excellence by the avclub staff is the thing that seems unnecessary to me. the movie can’t stand up on its own merits so we have to pretend like disliking it makes one a maga chud which is imo offensive. i mean look at you. you’re trying to…

you are indeed the chill and cool guy in this conversation that can’t tell the difference between active hate and being critical of a film on a pop culture website. 

the panic that takes place here when people correctly assess tlj as bad is weird. it’s ok to like bad movies even if people you don’t like think it’s bad for stupid reasons. there’s no reason to play make believe about it being coherent or artful or well conceived and executed. a maga hat will not magically manifest…