stackman
Stackman
stackman

I know. And, I get it. But as someone who has volunteered with alpine and backcountry Search and Rescue for years, we don’t go looking for people based on moral considerations. At the end of the day, these are lost people and we go looking for them. Period.

Sort of. Dolby Atmos for Headphones has a volume normalization feature you can turn on, but it’s really just sticking a compressor on everything and then turning it up. The end result is a complete loss of dynamics and an overall reduction in sound quality, but an overall evening of volume across all sources. Without

A pretty big feature I would want is Windows/Steam compatibility, does it nail that?

There is no middle ground with a lot of posters here. All AI is bad to them. They don’t see how ethical use of it could actually help artist and creators.

This is a gross misunderstanding of what is being said here as well as how software development works.

The idea behind the push for ai is that they can fully do away with their workforce.

The same argument could be made for procedural content. Why hire 10 level designers to handcraft levels when you can hire 1 level designer to lay the foundations for a procedural level creation system? Well, for one, handcrafted levels are always going to be higher quality than procedural ones. Procedural generation

basically the job of writing won’t go away, it’ll just change. instead of writing a massive number of lines to cover every conceivable contingency of interaction. They’ll just “teach” the AI “who” they are, their motivation, what they can say, what they can’t, etc.  This will still require writing, but the execution

Writing a research paper is an exercise in finding sources of relevant information, going through those sources to decide what information is useful, bringing all of that information into a single document, and synthesizing to form new conclusions. Not to mention that it requires the student to act independently. All

LOL, you think students are able to express complex, well-researched, in-depth thought orally? Some students do great with this, but most absolutely choke and struggle to have the nuance of a buzzfeed listicle. This isn’t a flaw in their intelligence, but rather, it is REALLY hard to remember a number of differing

The last sentence of this article is absolutely, hilariously wrong: “But hopefully, through examples such as this, we’ll come to realize AI’s ineptitude.”

A research paper may not always be a good test of comprehension, but it is a good test of the ability to research, synthesize and articulate information, which are important skills, which arguably are becoming less important with the advent of AI...

I feel like an hour and a half is plenty of time to test and make sure the game can run on your PC, which this move feels like more a reresponse after a year of pretty terrible PC ports

If Hollywood taught me anything, it’s that laypeople are smarter than professionals because they aren’t constrained by conventional knowledge.

There is literally nothing ethically dubious about artificial intelligence. All this pearl clutching is like candlemakers complaining about the invention of the electric light and saddle manufactures protesting the invention of the automobile.

Seems like a bad idea to double down on the sequel trilogy.

Yeah, this topic has way too much nuance for Kotaku to cover, at all. But using flimsy pretexts to write articles about the hottest topic on twitter is pretty much the job description at gawker. At least, when there’s not actually relevant news making headlines.

You should probably add that the FDIC has said that the cost of this bailout will be paid for the banking sector as a whole through a special assessment (i.e. higher FDIC insurance costs), not by the taxpayers. That makes it different from the 2008 bailouts.

Let's be fair, Apple owns a half of that shit sandwich. And for the same reasons!

While a scooter may look the opposite of scary, its low profile and quiet operation can make it a valuable asset.”