How are bisexual women discriminated against by lesbians? That’s like saying half-white/half-black people are discriminated against by black people, which is absurd.
squandering
squandering
It is the EXPECTATION that girls will give birth that makes us female, whether or not we fulfill it. No person born with testicles is ever expected to give birth.
Male people who transition before puberty never develop enough penile tissue to invert into a sex hole.
No radical feminist is “excluding” bisexual women, female whores, or anyone else who isn’t male. Radical feminists do often point out that bisexual women are, for most intents and purposes (ie, in the real world, not in their heads), straight, since they often (usually) are in heterosexual relationships. Radical…
How about having a kid who doesn’t mutilate their body in pursuit of something they can never have?
It is the expectation that girls will give birth, whether or not they fulfill it, that makes us female. No person born with testicles is expected to give birth. I don’t know why trans advocates make things more complicated than they need to be.
And what violence are female people going to do to a male-bodied person impersonating a female? This is a BS false equivalency.
Radical feminists aren’t denying the “existence” of trans men. We just acknowledge them as female, so we aren’t worried about them in our spaces.
Thank you! While they’re at it, I’d appreciate it if they could point out where on the planet people with penises are being sold off as whores/broodmares to old men in so-called marriages.
I think so. Any woman unable to compete with people born with testicles should just get back in the kitchen!
Male people who transition before puberty never develop enough penile tissue to invert into a sex hole.
No radical feminist is “excluding” bisexual women, female whores, or anyone else who isn’t male. Radical feminists do often point out that bisexual women are, for most intents and purposes (ie, in the real world, not in their minds), straight, since they are often (usually) partnered with males. And the only whores…
How about having a kid who doesn’t mutilate their body in the pursuit of something they can never have?
It is the EXPECTATION that girls will give birth that makes us female, whether or not we ever actually fulfill that expectation. No person born with testicles has ever been expected to give birth.
The EXPECTATION that girls will give birth is what makes us female. Whether or not a woman ever actually fulfills that expectation, she is still female. Anyone born with testes cannot be expected to ever be pregnant.
Male transgenders who don’t transition after puberty never develop enough penile tissue to invert into a sex hole.
It’s already being used to describe so-called leftists who deride so-called identity politics. You’ll have to find another word for female people who don’t think male people know anything about being female. Maybe realists?
The ones having to do with being FEMALE, which is why male transgenders are more concerned with being let into lesbian events and lesbian panties than fighting the misogynist legislatures.
How is it crazy? If a woman is a lesbian, she doesn’t like penises. If he was trying to coerce her into letting him penetrate her with his penis, then he was trying to rape her.
No one is “excluding” whores, bisexual women, or anyone who isn’t male from feminism. Bisexual women are for most intents and purposes (ie, out in the real world, not in their heads) straight, since they’re often in heterosexual relationships. Why they see people pointing that out as “exclusionary” I’ll never know.…