The juxtaposition looks bad, but I don't think kids are allowed to put a cross or Star of David on their caps either.
The juxtaposition looks bad, but I don't think kids are allowed to put a cross or Star of David on their caps either.
I didn't. I assumed since you had articles about her and her relative that she was part of it. Sorry, I'm not part of them at all...I just remember it from you appearing somewhere else in the comment boards and accusing them of the same things.
It's scary to think about how this kind of thing was considered no big deal until the last decade or so. Us adults always forget about how much trauma kids face growing up because we don't like to think about the terrible stuff that happened to us.
After going through something like that, it might be a good idea to talk to a counselor about your feelings. At least it never hurts.
These stories are horrifying, but I disagree about the conclusion. My reasoning is that you can retrain either the police or both them and colleges. It's best to focus all the energy and money towards retraining the police to take rape allegations seriously.
At least nowadays there is direct to on demand, so you don't have to wait for DVD to see it.
I'm guessing this is the person Tig Notaro had to get a restraining order against due to stalking.
Fair enough. I should point out that I wasn't intending to single you out, though I can see where it read that way.
People will realize that in conjunction with fauxrage lessening. Once they don't have ample room to say people are overreacting based on prior evidence, people won't be able to do much except apologize. That's happened for things like blackface where a person is specifically lampooning a race, but it hasn't for people…
Coincidentally, it allows the person accusing someone of racism to be right no matter what.
I agree that our country can be that way, but in this race nobody will buy it since McCain, Dole, and Reagan faced tons of questions about their ages. Even if sexism is the underlying factor, it'll be impossible to make that argument.
It's going to be almost impossible to paint questions about Hillary's age and health as sexism. Isha just tried to slip that in towards the end of the article and it completely didn't work.
While I don't disagree with the overall point about privilege, in this case it is the New York Post. Everybody gets treated like shit on their covers. They put a terrible picture and even worse pun on the cover every day.
I feel like Gen X and the Boomers thought they had figured race out at the same age. I think it's natural (and Millenials are less racist than older people overall).
As a sidebar, let's take a second to reflect upon the fact that the top brass of the most respected newspaper in the country wanted to hire someone to turn the business around but not be pushy.
Oh, we know it's wrong to laugh at it. Did it anyway. In fact, it being wrong to laugh at made it funnier. I guess I'm Goatse.
But the punishment isn't jail. It's expulsion from a university with a code of conduct. If you're found to violate the code of conduct, it doesn't matter what happened from a legal sense. Whether or not someone committed a crime isn't material, much less whether he or she was convicted. An example I'd use is cheating…
He or she is comprehending the law correctly. With a few exceptions, most employment is at will. The company can fire you provided they aren't violating discrimination laws.
It's not all about your vaginas, ladies! Us guys don't wear our clothes to try and impress women...eh, who am I kidding? Please don't make us wear short shorts.
Lindy,