All we have to do is nominate a reasonable candidate who can articulate a clear vision for where we should go as a country.

I don’t think so.

Let’s be fair. Cheney was the one behind most of that stuff. I’m not convinced Dubya really understood any of it and just played with his crayons.

(kidding, of course, fuck him fatally.)

I think you misunderstood as I didn’t call you an abuser, I said your suggestion is a similar technique used by abuse victims. Abusers often fly off the handle at little things so victims often end up walking on eggshells and rehearsing and coaching their words into something that attempts to dodge their triggers and…

So your suggestion is the most important thing about her words is that she coach them to make it slightly harder for conservative propaganda pundits who always act on bad faith to take out of context and that will make her more relevant?

Yes yes you’re trying to claim you don’t know what a regime is despite somehow listing ones earlier and also that you don’t know there are differences between a military and an international scouting organisation. Like I said your stupidity and dishonesty have collided, they’ve also made each other worse. Nice work.

Yeah this is your dishonesty and stupidity colliding. If I have decided on one definition and only that definition then you making a “comparative analysis” of other regimes to rebut what I said was pointless because you didn’t know what my definition of the word was. It would make perfect sense for you, who only has…

Oh so you didn’t intentionally misquote then and just finding reading hard. Yes that’s much better for you. And the murderous thing is the perfect example of your dishonesty/stupidity (or probably both) - you either don’t know or pretend not to know what it means so you can make a rebuttal about something else. The…

I’m consistent, you’re unoriginal hence why you’ve been all over the place from lying about things I said to begging me to debate your dishonest arguments. It’s obvious because the moment I laid that out you started fantasizing about me personally instead of the arguments you wanted me to make.

Yes you just given another response full of fantasy so you’re going to get the same reply. Perhaps after a while you might figure it out. Unlikely though. Glad you learned a new word at least.

So when I said you just regurgitate rote learned talking points, make up imagined responses from the other person, get mad about them and then argue against the positions you made up, you thought fantasizing about me and ideas and positions you think I hold wouldn’t get you told the same thing? Incroyable.

Oh you did not disappoint* - from inventing arguments no-one here has made to inventing a fantasy person making them your capacity for self deception is pretty good, sure we already established that from your initial posts but you’ve done a heck of a job confirming it all. Well done.

LMFAO you’re literally doing what I just said and constructing fake points to argue again because no-one is playing your dishonest little game. And what’s more you’re actually getting mad at the imagined responses. It’s hilarious but also a little sad, like a dog chasing his tail. But as you’re a completely…

You haven’t posed genuine questions you’ve regurgitated rote learned talking points that set up false dichotomies so you can regurgitate responses based on those fake oppositions. It’s breaking down now because it’s not working for you hence your terrible attempts to deny you fucked up, like trying to bullshit your…

Ha, yep you’ve done it again and made me laugh too, I told you I wouldn’t need your thanks. You’ve utterly failed at simple reading comprehension and now it’s been pointed out you’re throwing a shit-fit because it’s blown what you thought of as “aha!” moment out of the water.

Yeah see this is what I was saying about you being a dishonest little weasel. Even the mentally challenged can tell the difference between “one of the most murderous” and “the most murderous”. So you should just about be able to manage the same. And yet you pretend there’s no difference because it’s literally the only…

LMAO. You really can’t follow an argument that goes on for more than one post. You made a claim that someone had to do that shit. I said they didn’t. You then set up a false binary choice for the alternatives and I suggested there was more than just your two options. At which point you started in with apologia and…

Ok turns outI was mistaken and that you are in fact dumb as shit. From not knowing what a regime is to thinking “whataboutery” is a buzz word when it’s been in pretty common usage since at least GWB’s post 9/11 failure. And that’s before we even get to the irony of you moaning about something you think is performative…

82D airborne infantry... our attitude towards virtually everything is basically, “so fucking what?”

Viet Nam was fought to sell helicopters. WWII was fought to kill Nazis.