Real question—

This is the single most boring list of cities they could have chosen.

I fucking hate being a Sixers fan.

There’s this little cafe right across from my work. The place is great. Despite the huge amount of customers they get each day, they remember stuff about you personally: your most common orders, where you work, your name, etc.—hell, today they noticed that I had gotten a haircut even though I hadn’t been there in four…

Edit: I actually don’t care much and so I just deleted this...

Today I learned that Darrell Bevell reads Deadspin.

I guess I kind of understand the issue with the ballot, because I know there is a proper procedure, but—come on—we can tell who the vote was meant for:

I don’t see them as a dynasty, really, no. I suppose it all depends on what happens with the health of Fultz and Embiid, and whether Simmons can ever hit a jump shot, but they haven’t shown anything that suggests they’re going to be a dynasty. To be fair though, dynasties are a result, in part, of signing and drafting…

The Trail Blazers made a very impressive comeback against the 76ers tonight

Interesting that the RainX washer fluid is so fucking incredible, but their wipers are such incredible garbage.

Biggest issue I have with this all...

Fuck...now we’re blaming millennials for your old asses getting old?

This is the issue for which Democrats should be using the government shutdown as leverage.

I know we say it every time we talk about the GOP but....

FAU had three straight 3-9 seasons and only 7 conference wins over those three years combined. This year, they went 11-3 and a perfect 8-0 in the C-USA. In fact, the four years (prior to this year) they competed in the C-USA, they only had 11 total conference wins and 15 wins overall.

I’m sorry, I don’t quite know what you mean by an example of this? I thought I had given one when I said if Jones’ knee hit the ground and jarred the ball loose, it’s incomplete. It just seems like you want me to go through film and find an example for you?

What do you mean? A receiver would not maintain possession after initial contact with the ground if, after initial contact with the ground, the receiver loses possession. It’s self-explanatory; it’s written in a very non-vague way.

This is from the guy who couldn’t be bothered to write the correct language of a rule that is in the article and is the basis of the argument.

You edited the response, so I will reply again, because it looks like you took out the part that I responded to. But saying “football move” exists just as other terms is EXACTLY like saying “survive the ground” exists, but as other terms. What’s the difference, honestly? Forget I used the term “football move” then.…

The rule is clear. The ONLY way to establish possession whilst falling to the ground is to maintain control through contact with the ground until after his initial contact with the ground.