I don't understand it either.

I'm not saying you are incorrect, but where in her account does she make any mention of male toplessness?

Hmm..That's interesting but she doesn't really convey that in her instagram photos.

Yes, I also can't help but detect a whiff of self promotion.

I'm not sure what to make of this honestly. What exactly is she complaining about? That all breasts are created equal and should be displayed without fear of being rejected as 'unhawt' by instagram admin?

I am kind of confused on the inspiration behind her topless tirade. Is she upset because Instagram will only show 'attractive' nude females? So she was icnensed becuase they cut her photo and she took it to mean she wasn't 'hawt' enough for instagram? Or am I reading too much into that? Exactly who is she doing this…

Didn't realize that was a thing. Well good for NYC for promoting topless rights for all genders!

Wait a minute... Is it really legal to go topless on the streets of NYC?

I had hoped she would reference this case:

omfg, I can't even..... No its' not RAPE rape in the classical sense. However sexual assault and sexual harassment in the classical sense are totally OK!

Exactly, and why in the FUCK is this sketch saying that it is totally OK to pressure and sexually harass women? Just because they are in college? WTF

Not the point. Point is acting like a douche bag has nothing to do with sexual assault stats. They are saying that only RAPE-rape, is sexual assault. Soooo yeah, A dude grinding up on me at a frat party and whipping his junk out and taking my hand forcibly upon his half flaccid drunken penis is NOT RAPE-rape, and…

You are not the only one. We broke Kinja.

I think this article is so infuriating it has broken Jezebel. Had trouble posting earlier and am apparently not the only one.

I think this article is so infuriating it has broken Jezebel. Had trouble posting earlier and am apparently not the only one.

whoops sorry

Is this ALL that's' going to be written on Seth Rogen's twitter meltdown? You don't get to personally attack a Washington Post film critic because you disagree with her. Even if you are Seth Rogen. And the Washington Post is a step up from 'clickbait.' If it was like, Daily Beast or Slate I would say he has a point.

I have also been annoyed with Rogen as of late. I was not charmed by his going to congress to talk about Alzheimers either. I appreciate the sentiment he was trying to convey but it was like- "I am a celebrity so therefore I will straight to congress with my issues"