What’s wrong with a documentary film having a bias?

News reporters / networks / newscasters / journalists make money off of news stories as well. People have jobs and careers in order to make money. People pay for access to news stories because they want to be informed about what is going on in the world - people need to be paid to do the jobs that provide them that…

But your roommate (being that he was there first, and is apparently in charge of rent) is the primary renter, no? That utilities are included has no bearing on the issue. I still don’t see what you have to complain about, since you had been paying what you agreed to pay and are now paying less.

So, you had been paying what you agreed to, and are now paying less? Unless your name is on the lease (and any utility accounts, etc) and you carry as much legal responsibilty for the rental as your roommate does, I don’t see what there is for you to be upset about. Your situation is not an uncommon arrangement, and…

Yes, really.

It’s like some kind of lost SNL Tracy Morgan skit.

Odd that you redact her address when quoting her, yet leave it in on the embedded video that you are quoting from.

Perception happens in the brain, not the eyeballs.

Outside is definitely one of his best works. Took me a long time to come around to Earthling, but the more I listen the more I “get” it. Buddha Of Suburbia is another great one from that era as well (though it has a few songs I don’t necessarily care for).

She sounds like a toddler.

You are able to judge someone for the things they choose to think, as judging someone is simply forming an opinion of them. Forming / holding an opinion of someone and discriminating against them are not the same thing.

Every single reply this Marzipan person posts only shows them to be even more of a terrible person than has already become evident.

There are free dictionaries available online. Perhaps you should make use of one.

Yet another completely misleading headline...

You’ll have a hard time convincing me that the (overall) public perception of R. Kelly is that he is innocent of the crime (or that what he did was not a crime to begin with) - especially when you point the fact that it is so commonly referenced in pop culture / media.

Except for the fact that you are talking about it within the context of your R. Kelly trial reference.

You realize he’s going to trial to face charges involving only this one woman (not all 50), right?

So, you’re pointing to a planned anti-Beyonce protest (that you hilariously believe to have been real, rather than a hoax) that nobody showed up for as evidence of what you believe to be White America “losing their goddamn minds”? People (as a whole) don’t care nearly as much as you want them to. They really don’t.