NBC (unless other networks picked it up too). They started doing that shit last year where they just made the field between the line of scrimmage and first down dark green. Surprise! Grass also happens to be green...
NBC (unless other networks picked it up too). They started doing that shit last year where they just made the field between the line of scrimmage and first down dark green. Surprise! Grass also happens to be green...
What exactly does your screenshot of a Wikipedia page have to do with Paypal banning people for raising money to endanger refugees on the Mediterranean or Twitter banning people for trying to incite violence, which it says it will do in its guidelines? Which is a limitation Twitter has specifically placed on its…
yep.
In Canada we have hate speech laws. This allows law enforcement to charge facists based on their speech as an attempt to suppress the freedoms and rights of identifiable groups. The fascist’s right to free speech does not supercede an identifiable group’s right to exist without the threat of tyranny.
You win. No other comment on this article will beat this.
Today, you’ve won the internet.
THEN QUIT BITCHING AND GO SOMEWHERE ELSE.
God, I’m so sick of you whiny dipshits. No one cares what you didn’t want to read but clicked on anyway. I’m kind of baffled that you expected otherwise.
(blaming DarkwingChuck for everything, rightfully or not, is refreshing. i shall do this in the manner that YouSoCraazy did)
Says the guy complaining to a normal user about Gizmodo content, as if he wrote it. I was just trying to help. There was no sarcasm or insults, sorry you took it as such.
You remember when Gizmodo would post a story and half the comments weren’t complaining about the content the commenter knowing clicked on, read, and then decided to whine about? Those were good days.
Unlikely that they didn’t feel comfortable commenting back then. If you look at their two comments, they are both confrontational. One in Jan 2017, now this one in May. The second post bemoaning Giz posting an article, but not addressing it to the person that posted the article.
Nope. It’s a science blog. And Political Science is a thing. Which is what you’re reading about on this science blog. Technology is also a branch of science. If you want a tech blog, go to the help page of Best Buy’s website.
Somewhere, there is a field filled with her discarded Cheeto stained gloves. Almost all of the marks are on the dorsal aspect of the gloves.
Oh Snap! (or Bazinga, or whatever).
They’ve made literally two posts. Both from this year and both clearly siding with Trump. They bemoan a golden age of Giz, that they weren’t even here for.
In less than a year they’ll become their own over-used memes and just kill me now.
I’ll take the Cheetos as long as it’s not one of the bags from Orionsangel’s pic.
Why does it bother you of having these articles on Gizmodo? The argument seems to be equivalent to complaining a drug store selling toothpaste..
I can’t for the life of me figure out why Cheetos hasn’t tried selling bags of crunchy and puffy in the same bag.
They would go corrupt with billions.
Just send me a check for $33 million ok guys?
Remember that time when the internet was just porn? Come on guys..is this the only way to get people to read these days? You can do better than this tripe, i think