Nope, he's only slightly exaggerating. I haven't played ACIII, but it ain't a good sign when you have to compare the amount of tailing missions from this game to another game just to get that looks positive. They're a relic of the series, and either Ubisoft does something new to freshen them up, or they need to take…
Souls
souls
I say yes. No, I don't want incremental upgrades each year, that's why I ignored Assassin's Creed after Brotherhood. However, I do want a good pirate game, and I'd imagine it could be quite unique without having to carry the luggage of an old franchise with it.
Sure it does, but that't for TV. You don't want to play actual games like that.
So it's a good thing that the X1 attracts cat fur?
Well, okay. That led me to this.
Agreed, though now I realized I forgot a word. He was a loony who made fun of popular things. There we go.
Now playing
Related.
Never did play Xenogears... :(
I probably should have waited and actually consider this comment before I posted it. I agree, it does sound pretty generic, and that's probably why it sounds so familiar.
Tomb Raider is the best Isolated Island Adventure game ever, and AC4 is the best pirate game. So just pick whichever you prefer, though I'd agree and say Tomb Raider was robbed.
Na, Trevor was just another loony who made of popular things. I prefer my loonies with style and self-awareness.
The port was pretty fantastic, and I don't see the 120hz cap being an issue. What's your point? I said all you'd need is a decent PC to play this game with either the best settings or a little less, and it would still beat this "version" because it'll likely be locked at 30fps.
Hey now, I still haven't beat the game.
Disagree. Using light as a weapon became much better as the game progressed, and it promoted a style of play that had more to do with managing your enemies than "shine on and kill". If you rarely used the flares, or "shined" enemies one at a time just to off them, then you're doing it wrong.
Regardless of how many bugs there actually were at launch, that was launch. This is only worth a purchase if your only system is a current-gen console, and if you haven't played it before. A decent PC would be good and the game's almost always on sale.
Neither do I, but I got my system after launch. We'd have to go back in time and rake through hundreds of internet pages to get an accurate example of how good or bad those launches were.
Thinking that the two are comparable and actually comparing them is backwards thinking.
It's someone's opinion whether or not it's a shitty move on Riot's part. Most people, as do I, believe in that perspective.
Comparing "E-Sports" with traditional "sports" falls apart when you realize pro players stream themselves playing these games daily, and for long stretches of time.