The numbers hint at at least 19 or 20 players, but I counted 15. It's a strong possibility.
Souls
souls
I was actually a pretty good dogfighter on PS3, I really hope the jets control well enough too.
Yup, that has to be it. Not counting the player, I see fifteen others during that part.
I love the attention to detail they give to twins, there's a quite a few cross-armed guys wearing green shirts and women with white hats.
Exactly. Battle them, it's probably best that you carry a few wild barries. Or a crowbar.
You gotta level up a few more times while in the sun, thank god these games are portable.
A quick google search brings up these two articles:
She's had years after that to think about it.
Eh... that story at the the end heavily implied that she was ready to go.
No. Performance is mixed, with some improvements and some negative effects on loading times. What little improvements there are, are minimal.
Ouch...
Yup, knew these optional installs wouldn't stay optional for long. Would be nice if everyone could stream everything from the disk with maybe one or two load times through the entire game...
Seems legit.
Meh, they're a large company which doesn't have a nearly-spotless record.
Ah, okay, nothing changed then. Still, that does mean the gap's been shortened a bit, assuming you went with past assumptions.
Perception comes into play when you're arguing whether or not the patch fee was used to keep good games out, or to simply gather money for a service developers were using.
Well, aren't they supposed to be beefing up the internals just before launch? It's true that these things matter less when you get to the actual games, but that performance gap could make quite a bit of difference late in the console's life with multi-platform games. You know, like how many big games perform worse on…
Yeah, sure, because paying for a dev kit and sending it through QA isn't enough. I've already said that these policies are archaic, but not for the same reasons you stated.