That’s not true at all. She edged Obama slightly in overall popular vote, but he won more states and more delegates.

You know, ordinarily I would agree with this, but given what is going on in Flint right now I'm finding this particular crime hard to let go of.

I liked it better than the second season as well. There were some really great character moments.

That would be amazing and I don’t understand why it doesn’t already exist. Or why there isn’t a biography.

Yes. Everything you just said. I do not get the Luke thing. The way he treated Lorelei when his long-lost daughter suddenly showed up was awful. Max was perfect for her, but I will take Christopher over Luke any day of the week. (Also, I am rewatching season 3 right now and can’t get over what a terrible guardian Luke…

But most of those people have been nominated and/or won Academy Awards, which means they're in for life: "Lifetime voting rights will only be granted to those who have had three ten-year terms or those who have won or been nominated for an Academy Award (so Barkhad Abdi is set for life)." It seems like what the…

The big omissions that everyone is talking about are Idris Elba for Beasts of No Nation and Michael B. Jordan for Creed. Will Smith had an outside chance for Concussion, but I think that was a real longshot.

Every time I watch Downton Abbey, I make the decision to singlehandedly bring back hats. Unfortunately, by Monday morning, the feeling has passed.

Brendan's confession is obviously false because there is no corroborating physical evidence. If she'd been shot in the garage there'd be tons of blood. They couldn't find any. If his story were true Halbach's DNA would be all over that house. I don't need to see corroboration of every detail. But they should have been…

The most fascinating thing about Jeb’s campaign is that he is somehow making 43 look like the smart, emotionally stable member of the family.

When I saw the headline, I thought it was about Keri Russell and Matthew Rhys. Imagine my disappointment to discover it was two people I’d never heard of.

Don’t forget, “Reasonable doubt is for innocent people.” After saying that he should have just been disbarred on the spot.

I was on a jury a few years ago and was very encouraged that no one really tried to get out of it during voir dire and everyone deliberated like a calm, rational human being.

I've missed the last couple of episodes, because of the holidays, but I'm going to try to catch back up this week. I do think it's a pretty interesting story.

Do you have a theory about how and where Avery committed the crime? I don't necessarily think he's innocent (whereas I think the nephew almost certainly is) but I can't explain the lack of blood in his house and garage. The only thing we know for sure about Halbach's death is that she was shot in the head, so there…

I don’t think it was a stunt because I think they would have handled it more smoothly if they’d planned it.

I think that’s only in criminal cases, but I’m not sure (not a lawyer). At any rate, I think it’s something that differs from one jurisdiction to another and is more limited than people generally believe.

The main reason I'm not convinced of Avery's guilt is that they couldn't find Halbach's blood anywhere in his house or garage. To me that is the big stumbling block.

He's a socialist! And a fascist! And he wants to impose atheistic sharia law!

It is such an obvious ploy for sympathy that I am almost embarrassed for him. I thought my eyes were going to roll right out of my head when I saw that.