Well, obviously that may influence my thinking. But I was talking about observing both candidates (Hillary and Bernie) and how they handle increased scrutiny and hone their skills on the political stage (much like we observed Obama and Clinton in 2008).

I mean, his voting record has been on board with it for a while.

I’ve had a Bernie bias ever since Hillary Clinton started trying to smear him as a patriarchal sexist, which is about as slimy as you can get. Lying to womens’ faces about Bernie Sanders to secure their vote is pathetic.

lol, this is such a troll comment.

Did you really start a 1-post burner account just to tell us we should vote for someone purely based on their gender, rather than, say the content of their character?

Huh? When was he getting shat on for not addressing women/GSM rights?

He has higher ratings on being pro choice, and pro gay marriage than hillary or obama do, hillary and obama just jumped on the pro gay bandwagon within the last decade.

JFC, I’m a woman (lesbian too) and I would never vote for Hillary just b/c she’s female. Just being a woman is not a reason, you have to be a good decision maker. She voted for Iraq invasion, killing thousands of Iraqi women. When asked about WALL ST ties she cried 9/11 like Guillani would! She called the Egyptian…

Oh, and I am not a “bro”. I am female. I find the “berniebro” meme tiring and idiotic. Come with some substantive criticisms, not name calling, please, berniebro-slingers.

NEVER ASSUME AMERICA IS TOO SMART TO VOTE FOR THE IDIOT

This is the smug attitude that could easily put a Republican in the White House. Yeah, the GOP nominees are horrible but the GOP could absolutely win regardless of who they nominate. They have a monopoly on the racist, sexist, and homophobic vote in this country. Those are not a tiny percentage. They’re a significant…

If your idea of a democrat is continued stop-and-frisk and disenfranchisement of anyone not a millionaire...

As a woman I’m voting for Bernie because he doesn’t play politics to play politics like Clinton does. She’s been late to the party on every social issue, including women’s rights.

I dunno; I rather like the rumors of Bloomberg running instead.

Yes let’s protect the rights of those not yet out of the womb. The right to be lazy, the right to kill at will. We got ya there.

I can understand why you’d prioritize reproductive rights but again, you’re choosing to distinguish between the candidates on an issue they’re identical on, and dismissing the issues on which they are polar opposites.

If the vitriol keeps anybody home on election day if Clinton gets the nomination, that’s not okay, at all... We don’t have the luxury to be picky yet, and as much as you might counter that you’ve got to start sometime, you say that from a safe place where these rights aren’t at stake.

Congress is pretty busy working on reasonable gun control legislation and making finely-tuned improvements to Obamacare, so it might be hard to fit that in.

I really don’t know. I just know I don’t see any percentage in destroying the Other One when what matters is that we get a Democrat. I just don’t. If the vitriol keeps anybody home on election day if Clinton gets the nomination, that’s not okay, at all. Because this is a matter of basic rights being in jeopardy if a…

Trust me, you won’t have time to exercise the reproductive rights Hillary will give you because you’ll be too busy starving to death while working multiple jobs and paying for your health insurance and student loans.