somenameoranother
somenameoranother...and now another...thanks kinja
somenameoranother

I think neither and as someone who has been involved in vetting political appointees, you don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about.

I’ve got family in Kansas. Most of them are happy that the schools won’t be forced to close or that the roads can be fixed. However, my father, whose new wife introduced him to “gawd”, is absolutely sure this was “liberals taking money from hard working people” (despite the veto override, like the state, being mostly

...or the hookers are men. Or somewhere in between.

Sorry, counselor, but your noble lawyer shtick is fucking bullshit (and I suspect intentionally disingenuous based on your personal offense at my statement).

Sadly, she may suck at debating, but she scored the biggest debate hit in the campaign. In the primary debate she asked Ossoff who he’d vote for - the point being, he can’t vote for any of them since he doesn’t live in the district.

The Paris Accord is a great example. No one in Sistermom, Mississippi gives a fuck about the environment in terms of voting. They may care about it in general, even deeply on a personal level, but it constantly polls outside the top ten issues voters care about (nationwide). Going on and on about how an R is a

Sigh. Your edit is sadly too true. Purity test assholes will lead us to fucking Emperor Trump (or worse - a smart autocrat).

I’m still waiting find out what this woman’s connection to Russia is.

One would hope his firm’s involvement as advisors to Rosneft, the Russian state oil company, would be enough to raise at least a few GOP red flags.

Yeah, well, it looks like the Russians started this, and with ol’ Donnie, you know which of the two competing interests - America’s or Russia’s - he values more.

Turns out, Russia!

Now, now, the Qatari don’t have beautiful Trump properties. This should teach them the true lesson here: Donnie don’t give a shit what you do as long as he and his get paid - in cash or adulation, but preferably cash.

Well, serves the Qatari right for not using his hotel for their celebrations and moving their airline’s offices out of Trump Tower. I mean, the Saudis paid him, so of course he took their side.

But they aren’t wrong. Take your exact statement, change the target audience, and viola! A pro-Trump statement:

Of course not, but that contrarian eagerness can easily be channeled (or manipulated) in evil ways the non-evil person never intended.

Well, they burned an anti-Russia leaker and provided a GOP talking point to dominate the questioning at hearings this week, so maybe it was intentional?

I figured, but my inner 12 your old couldn’t help it...

...and the second answer refers to the $30 mil a month it costs the taxpayers to have Melania live in NYC instead of the WH because, for some reason, she refuses to move in with Gorky Pig.

what ‘side peen’ is

Damn, everyone involved in this admin is corrupt AF!