sodakak1701
The Name's Bond, Gold Bond Powder.
sodakak1701

Several low level WH employees would also be fired.

There was definitely an element of charm to his stupidity. Trump actively courts the lowest common denominator.

George W. Bush’s reputation is the only thing benefiting from this mess of a presidency.

The “I won’t call them monsters” bit of theater is literally nothing but a means of making it about himself. It’s nothing more or less than a variation of “did you see what I did there? Aren’t I clever?” He’s supposed to be expressing deeply felt emotions of condolence, and he can’t find a way to do it that doesn’t

I interpret that as just more “rats from a sinking ship” behavior. To my ear, that has all the markings of an exasperated communications professional rolling his or her eyes after hearing the speech, leaning over to the nearest reporter, and saying “you know that was his bullshit, not mine.”

2 good

I could just see FDR doing this.

The White House said that the use of the phrase “evil losers” in reference to the perpetrators of the attack (ISIS has taken credit) was Trump’s own personal flourish.

Yeah being called a loser by Trump - that must’ve stung.

I find it surprising that the White House thought it would be necessary to tell us that the embarrassingly puerile “evil losers” burn was Trump’s invention. You don’t say!

Let’s not forget about the so-called liberals who decided the couldn’t (just couldn’t!) vote for Hillary Clinton because she was “just as bad” as her opponent. On specific points like this (budget, travel ban, gutting the EPA, education, clean water regulations, handing intelligence to Russia) I wonder if they truly

Rest in peace, Sir Roger. You were always a fantastic sport about how absurdist and ridiculous your Bond films had gotten by the end, but god help me if I don’t adore Moonraker for all of its wacky Bugs Bunny hijinx.

He can’t do that. That defeats the purpose of an attack: to give him fodder for websites like this.

There’s a debate that needs to happen about the appropriate level of social welfare. That debate can’t happen because one of the major parties insists that level is “zero” and characterizes people who rely on the social safety net as lazy entitled drains on society (I’ve dealt with those folks on occasion, this

Well, Betsy is busy curating her collection of children’s tears and Ben Carson accidentally trapped himself in a street mime’s invisible box. Here is Trump mistakenly addressing Bannon’s “exoskeleton” for 10 minutes.

Sure didn’t cause any Republicans to give a fuck either.

I was at the arena on Thursday for a concert and have been plenty of other times - the security is fairly reasonable (as in bag checks on entry) but the doors are all opened up at the end to allow people to get out and I don’t think any security is in place then, so it’s entirely possible someone gained access towards

Sandy Hook didn’t do it for you?

Wait until someone tells Stan Kroenke how cheaply he can sign Moyes.

Seriously? It has to be that explicit for you to understand what he’s saying?