Except for the other way. Can't they have you sign a non-compete when you join saying that you can't take a job with a direct competitor for a certain amount of time?

It depends on the context. If I'm an isp or a university network where I have minimal control over client configuration I should expect my clients to do whatever they please so long as they don't degrade service. Certain preemptive measures are expected like blocking standard incoming ports. Further, any web…

W/r/t hackings, most are due to software design and poor security controls on the customer service side.

Also, most of those scanning tools can be used to selectively scan for particular vulnerabilities and some of the best tools are free. Anyone could have gotten and performed a scan, he's only in trouble for exposing laziness.

What about my first point? Security through obscurity is not security at all. Preventing people from running security scans on networks like a school is asinine.

If it was really a conspiracy they wouldn't have to rush anything, they'd be ready, amirite? Politicians don't gain much because its a typical hardline right issue: our way or the highway, compromise is for wimps. The only legislation that will pass is completely ineffective giving the right more fodder to criticize…

A) any admin worth their salt should have the various nodes footprints locked down in such a way that would allow only the info they want to let out be let out. On top if that, even with a cheap router you can figure ou who is using the network traffic and take that computer off the network.

No argument from me, but devil's advocate: if you think all arms are good arms, why not sacrifice some aesthetics for the good of the cause?

I don't understand the notion of suspending kids that threaten others. Shouldn't they be enrolled in some in school therapy? If you suspend them you're sending them home shamed where they can arm themselves and return.

They aren't banned. The ban expired almost a decade ago. You can own automatic weapons if you get special permits.

So that only rifles that require some sort of action to reload ate allowed? Makes sense, butwhy would a gun person want to point this out? Why not let them make more pointless laws and then applaud when the do nothing?

Your strategy therefore is, if you don't like what someone said, pretend they said something else and respond to that.

The new troll method: say something brief and asinine begging for a snarky response then give a 10k word infodump full of skewed facts and hope that no one can reply.

Pretty sure a private school can do whatever it pleases with it's money, also.

Quick story: a police officer friend of mine posted an article from independent review that said that "NBC admitted that no assault rifles were used in the sandy hook shooting." Their evidence? A video released the day after the incident that they claim has more veracity than the police cheif's summary 3 days later. …

Are we having a discussion? It seems like a pro gun control person suggests something and then the antiguncontrol person says: second amendment, more guns, better people. The problem is the anti side sees no need to compromise. I'm worried about the concessions the gun control side will have to make to pass this…

I remembered the earlier reports that she worked there...Just found this saying you're right: http://news.yahoo.com/nancy-lanza-reportedly-wasnt-teacher-sandy-hook-elementary-163928460.html then there is this article http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/15/us/connecticut-lanza-family-profile/index.html quoting a neighbor (as…

Definitely a popular theory. Along with killing her off to add to his legend for his Heisman push.

But YouTube is real! It's authentic! No one lies on YouTube! The comments section is the new revelations!

The thing is, no one is saying that you run the transcript through a machine and you take the results to court and say: "LIAR!!!! GO TO JAIL!!!!"