Axioms excluded her second tweet:
Axioms excluded her second tweet:
A Sandish Facebook friend of mine question what Hillary’s policy positions were, because they were apparently not clear enough from the 200 page plan that she released (and the simplified version on her website).
Yeah, Hilary gets a bad rep after the elections. Regardless of the fact that she is still a capitalist first, she isn’t heartless or ball-less for that matter. She has been holding her own in the political game for over 35 years! You don’t survive in this landscape without busting balls.
Blah blah blah. You hate Hillary and Obama. Have a cookie.
Hey, asshole. The shelf-life for blaming Obama and Clinton for Trump has expired.
Oh for fucks sake, Hillary isn’t running in 2020. You should have quit while you were ahead and just stuck with the Sanders tweet. You’re not doing Sanders or his supporters any favors by dragging Obama and Hillary on here.
Sanders is irrelevant at this point. You don’t see a separate article for each senator who called them out.
In all honesty, in a couple of years, you won’t begin to believe how stupid you sound.
What? How is HRC’s tweet storm from earlier today any more “ball-less” than Sanders’ tweet? One tweet in particular reads: “But the incitement of hatred that got us here is as real and condemnable as the white supremacists in our streets.”
Not sure how that is all that much different.
Yeah, it’s not like HRC talked about those “deplorables”.
If Spencer was denied service because the restaurant was closed, I like that. If he was denied service because he’s a shit-stirring, trouble-making asshole, I like that even better.
I read a report recently (can’t find the link) about a nuke expert who makes a strong case that the truck-mounted Hwasong-14 missiles are basically the DPRK version of “look at the spinning disc; you are getting sleepy now.” He points out that neither the USSR nor the US were ever able to develop liquid-fueled mobile…
Also, he changed all the guns to walkie-talkies.
As of this exact moment we don’t know who it was, but the white supremacist contingent came equipped with improvised weaponry and shields, and was beating protesters en masse. I don’t know how you can possibly do a “both sides” here.
You know, there are some things I want made by an over-priced contractor and a submarine is one of them. Who thought that a crowd-funded submarine was a good idea? Whoever it was, don’t let that person get into a position of any authority ever again.
“I agree, many people are very conservative in what they’ll buy, and freak out if something offers a different set of tradeoffs than what they’re used to, and what society has deemed “normal,” even if the new set of tradeoffs is better for them personally.”
In a fair world, assholes like him would be shunned and cast out. In a fair world, they’d be knocked down to the sewers of society where they belong.
Well the problem is even the dated Leaf is kicking the Bolt’s ass in sales, so someone must be saying the Leaf formula is working. Both aren’t close to Tesla, but I’m not sure if any non-niche automaker can challenge Tesla’s brand position.
100% fault of the escort car. The escort vehicle was supposed to block traffic and also keep a shorter distance between him and the APC, at least that’s how it was supposed to be done. Here however, the distance was too great and the escort kept on going. The other problem is that they didn’t disable the traffic light…
Range issues are pretty much a non-factor if you’re an average car owner once the EV can do 150-200 miles on a charge. Most people don’t go 200 miles in a day or probably in most weeks. Many people also already own two cars, if they need to take a longer trip, they can take the ICE car. Or renting a car for a road…