Hey! We don't know that Jon's dead! He was technically still alive when we last left him. Anything could happen.

Barbara as Nightwing? When was that? I thought I had seen all of them.

If Emma was able to wake Henry then Henry should be able to wake his grandfather. Right?

There was light during the day before the sun. And, as I said, it is possible there is a lost in translation error. However, in the event of creation by an almighty, omnipotent, then these things would all be possible. He could have created the stars and then stretched the light, possibly.

I didn't say it was the primary issue, I said it was one of the primary issues; it was one of the top issues for all involved, and the number one issue for many. It was not the number one issue for all, though it was near the top of the list for them.

Wait, let me get this straight, they stars to which you are referring [the ones that are further away than could ever be reached by any human, even if we could travel at light speed] give light upon the Earth; like they actually provide enough light to see our surroundings? That's odd, because on the night I was in…

Eh. I was never that into it. I did discuss the Elliot screen test today, though. Henry Thomas was amazing in that.

Yeah, I was going to comment that it was probably a lost in translation deal.

Verse?

Was it there and now it's underwater?

Who do I blame? I'm the oldest. The only time I had an older sibling was my dad's third marriage; my stepsister. I was already an adult, and it didn't last long.

It's all because of the changes made to E.T., such as the removal of the guns. Completely unnecessary bullshit.

That's one thing Supernatural got correct regarding the Judeo-Christian Bible; dead people do not become angels, angels are separate beings. Though the possessing people is relegated only to demons in the text.

I enjoy being buzzed. I've only been so drunk as to not enjoy the feeling a couple of times. Each time it snuck up on me because I was unaware of how much alcohol I was actually consuming. I have learned to be more aware. It is, however, not something I want to do every day.

Slavery was just one of the many issues that sparked the Civil War. State rights were the primary issue, and the supposed right to own slaves was one of the primary "rights" at issue within those parameters. But the Civil War was not solely, or even primarily, about slavery.

They could have at least claimed the stars existed before the Earth was created. Or maybe that light stretched when the universe expanded.

You're misreading the second reference. 18 & 19 are two separate thoughts. 18 is a reference to the reason for the creation of Eve. 19 refers back to the prior creation of animals to lead into Adam naming all the animals.

Wouldn't that be 4,000 BC, give or take, if 2000 was the point at which it is counted backwards to 6,000?

It says the rain lasted for 40 days and nights, not that the flood did. Just saying.

Where do I go to see the comparison between this and the old one?