snail-mail-bride-3newaccount
BallOfTwine
snail-mail-bride-3newaccount

“The unless is very simple—it’s unless someone in my household needs me or unless something changes in my own life.” Wow, lucky her! Having a choice is great, isn’t it? I remember it well. And those are great reasons to leave that shitshow of a campaign, Kellyanne. In the meantime, the pay must be great!

“Screw you, Shep. Not everyone has the freedom to do what you think they should.” Those people don’t care. I can’t stress that enough. They simply do not care, even the ones who seem lovely and personable. They are, comparatively, to the truly amoral, evil ones, and they won’t pass up an opportunity to throw you under

Every time I see a photo of Holmes, I think of a line written by someone I was in a writing workshop with: “There’s a black turtleneck in my future.” A shame, too, because I loved that line because I thought it was funny.

“A court case would have been risky for both parties involved, however possibly riskier for Harris Faulkner (the woman) because without that concrete proof, upon possible failure, Hasbro could have gone after her for litigation fees.”

“but I’d be pretty pissed if someone decided to make money off of my image without permission and without giving me a cut.” Exactly. There isn’t one person I know who would be fine with that.

“McDonald’s employees have the right to work in a place that is free from harassment, intimidation or abuse, sexual or otherwise, or acts or threats of physical violence. We do not tolerate verbal or physical conduct that demeans another person, unreasonably interferes with another’s work performance or creates an

“Are you trying to demonstrate a false equivalence?” Abortion is murder is the first false equivalence, so.

Perfect comment, and genuinely funny, too.

Thank you so much.

How did you do this? I need to get this asap. What’s the name of the add-on?

You and Starbuck’s Mom have nearly identical comments.

“Protesters don’t have a right to injure loot and put the safety of others at risk[.]” There isn’t one person in this country, protester or not, who has the right to injure, loot, or put others at risk. Our constitution, civil, and human rights protect each and every one of us from that.

Excellent point, but it isn’t fair to the people who didn’t vote for him. But it is an excellent point, and one that I’ll keep in mind for certain truly frivolous lawsuits in NYC that taxpayers have foot the bill for within the last two or three years*. I guess you could call it entertainment tax.

Because she’s just as repugnant. Look at her book cover and read the title, and remember everything she espoused while working there.

“CBS stands by the broadcast and will do so in court.”

I don’t know yet, but they might be the same thing. When I find out, I’ll let you know. If I still have access to my internet, that is.

Lol, it’s almost the best we can hope for, isn’t it?

I’ll steal your tradition, but, instead, I’ll watch them on my wedding anniversary.

Lol, good sleuthing.

Really? How do you know? Genuine question: don’t they usually have some allusion to ‘tomato’ in their name?