Just promise that they’ll be Rich! and Great! and Happy! Like, happier than they’ve ever been! He promises!

“As Les Moonves famously said, “Trump may not be good for America, but he’s damn good for CBS.” - A honest-to-goodness piece of shit, that Les Moonves.

Weak attempt at trolling.

Yes, and there is no such thing as “implied consent” - nothing is consent but consent, full fucking stop. I’m sure you’d agree with that, AuroraDM83.

This happened in the ‘70s, and I don’t know if the woman tried to sue her. It was a different time. If that happened today, I can’t imagine she wouldn’t.

Because it isn’t art, or even “art” - it’s paying someone to film someone against their will. There are some who have labored under high-minded but misguided notions for the sake of art, but the buck *should* stop at harassment, violation, and illegal activity.

You might want to start with how she paid someone to stalk and film an unsuspecting woman without her consent (a man who refused to stop filming her even when she made it abundantly clear that it was causing her duress), if you’re so interested. Yoko Ono defended it as art. She’s since been involved with and made…

Go sell more teacups, all while invoking your dead husband (and everything that’s come to mean within the last few years), Yoko. And go fuck yourself while you’re at it, greedy, entitled, soulless asshole.

Lol at these white, rich, corporate-protected abusive feminists. I will never not laugh in the faces of these two assholes.

Why are you being so aggressive? I stopped in order to clarify the substance of my original comment, which is exactly what I wrote to you. If you’re reading something more, that’s on you. If I were being an asshole, I wouldn’t 1) finish reading the rest of your comment 2) let you know that I wasn’t dismissing your…

“This is absolute bullcrap here, though, based on the very same bias that is being discussed, here. Here we have a convenient explanation that makes the horrific assumption[...]”

“YES. Abusers think they’re the ones being abused, but you can always tell which is which by which one is trying to avoid, and which is trying to force themselves into the other’s spaces.” Exactly this. It’s similar to a person who claims to be in fear for their life when the supposed threat is running away from them,…

Kinja, not Kinda

Sure, Kourtney, whatever you say. They can’t watch it but they’re paraded in front of the cameras to participate in their ridiculous, manufactured drama? Fuck off.

Following the old accounts is fine. I’m fairly certain everyone knows my Twitter accounts by now, too.

Kinda denied my saved passwords as well. What’s the point of saving them if they’re going to reject them and force you to make a new account? This is my fourth one, but I’m following my inactive ones, so.

Because the lives of men are inherently more valuable than the lives of women. (This fact is doubly so when the man is famous/rich/powerful.)

For the last ten years or so, yes.

Standing ovation for this comment (not really. I’m lying down on the sofa, but I’m doing it in spirit).

Or maybe *you* should do better for your country, Trump. There’s a fucking thought.