Don’t be a twat. In general, yes, one should perform the duties for which they were hired while at their place of employment. However, work environments are not perfect places. Employers shouldn’t have the right to impose unrealistic or unreasonable policies or practices against employees. In other words, the…

Who would know? What percentage of Deadspin readers are likely Finns? I'm guessing less than 5%🤭

The Bears Missed a Field Goal and Lost Their Mind. Send Kleenex. 

Ouch. Also Ron Jones of the Phillies, Michael Irvin of the Cowboys in 1999.

Seems like Drake would prefer that Matt Whittaker, the former Big Dick Toilet System guy, was still the AG, so he could be assured that the Twitter accounts of all libs would be shut down. In an interview with Laura ingraham, Whittaker said “Abuse of power is not a crime.” So Drake could continue to post violent…

“...the old turf fields (see Veterans Stadium) were awful...”

Look how it turned out for Zac Brown, formerly of the Redskins, after dissing Kirk Cousins before the Eagles/Vikings tilt last week. It was a total jinx.

“...didn’t anyone think to test out one of the new seats before buying several thousand of them?”

Not sure what “performs in a bowl of milk” means, but Frosted Flakes become flaccid once they penetrate the milk surface. They're premature e-crack-ulators. 

I’m glad you posted this rhetorical question. I posted a similar hypothetical in another thread yesterday. Like you, I qualified it by admitting it might be controversial and that I’d likely take shit for it.

I was raising a question, not defending the guy. I acknowledged I’d take shit for it. I even advocated terminating the guy with extreme prejudice if he was found to be acting in ways adverse to his responsibilities. It’s pretty clear that positing an idea for consideration doesn’t go over so well, and that not…

Seeing the other comments here I suspect I’ll take some shit for this.

The mind can only take so much boggling. And you thinking that you’re presenting some novel interpretation of Trump that is exculpatory is one straw too many. 

Romostradomus, Never Fuck with Hello, America!!

FFS, why are you fighting this so hard?You must have missed out on how technology is used today. Most people seem to avoid making calls whenever possible. Texting is quick. If you forget something you don’t have to call back. It’s hardly “stretching” anything.

How do we know? Don’t you read? Because Volker disclosed it, dumbass. Why do you think Trump doesn’t want Sonland to testify? Because 1) he has an audit trail, and 2) he’ll be busted for trying to delete messages from his device.

Clearly the right hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. 

I’m pretty despairing of the notion that he’ll suffer the consequences he so richly deserves. At the end he’ll be swept under the rug and we’ll be left with fighting a regressive judiciary for the next two or three decades.

You must have had a great nap. How do you feel now that you've woken up and he's still here?

Who’s left who is not in an “acting” capacity? The braintrust of Ross, DeVos, Perdue, and Carson? We’re so fucked.