Agreed, poorly explained. This is not what the world would look like if every country had 100 million people (it would look exactly the same as it does today), this is what the world would look like if there were a line drawn around every 100 million people

Yeah, I see now. Though I don't see the point.

Doesn't redrawing country borders change their size?

I don't think he was actually lying on the ground for a year

Oh wait, is this using the current world population and then dividing that by 100 million, and thus needing to create new fake countries to house all of the displaced people from countries like China? If so, that makes no sense. What are the names of these new countries?

I don't understand the concept here. What criteria is being used to resize each country? If size is based on population, and population is assumed to be 100,000,000, wouldn't they all be the same size? What am I missing here?

You know that when people use names like "AssBook", "Goggle", "CrApple", "Microsuck", and so on, that they sound stupid and no one cares what else they have to say? You do know that, don't you?

Like it or not, the name Blackberry is now tainted. Blackberry itself is what's keeping adoption of BBM almost non-existant

Fair enough

How would one use an inflatable ladder on the average plane?

No, such a counter would defy the laws of physics.

I'm not going on about anything. I just find it absurd when people give the "if you don't get it, I won't help you" or "I prefer people figure it out for themselves" reply when confronted with a legitimate question. You have an opinion on something, but you refuse to explain why, which makes me think that it's not…

I'd hit it

Thank you!

Just as I suspected. What a fucking cop out.

You bring up two great questions that no one has ever been able to answer:

The cost doesn't always get passed on to the consumer. Depending on the retailer, simply raising prices isn't an option. Let's say Target is getting hit with a ton of chargebacks from fraudulent transactions. They can't just start selling iPads for $549 instead of $499 like everyone else. The selling price of many…

It seems nobody is actually reading my question. The bank does not take the loss, the retailer does.
There would be far less fraud if the retailer was allowed to verify identification, which we are not allowed to do.
Since the banks ARE NOT financially responsible for losses, they have little incentive to lay out the…

As a business owner, I can assure you that I take a chargeback for every disputed transaction. I could avoid a lot of fraud if I was allowed to ask for ID, but I am not.

Yeah... I'm talking about today, not 2015