"space" would actually be considered 7 characters by most websites

I think the problem is the language of the law. If the girl was under 18, then she was a minor, no argument there. The problem I have is that we use the same legal terminology for texting a self taken, nude photo of a teenager as we do for distributing images of actual children (you know, like 5 year olds or…

No, but an incurable, terminal disease is worse than a photo of a naked 17 year old.

No kidding! I've had three hard drives fail in my entire life, and all three were LaCie. All three crapped out at about 13 months. No thanks!

Well there you go!

Are you sure about that (I'm not)? I don't see anything stating that Google won't hire a current Apple employee, just that they were asked not to actively recruit. The difference between the two is pretty big, do you have a source for your claim?

OR! You could apply for a new job while still employed! There's always that option...

"so, piracy is some kind of ultimate evil that all personal rights can, and should, be trampled in order to stop it?"

"You're talking as if the evidence has already been proven irrefutable and that the government is 100% correct"

"People are complaining about it because they were using the website for perfectly legitimate purposes and now as a result of it's shut down have lost their data."

You didn't read...

The better answer it, yes I read the article. What makes you think I didn't?

Why are so many people siding with MegaUpload in this matter? Yes, the RIAA and MPAA are a bunch of bitches, but MegaUpload was clearly in the wrong. The only party who should really have a choice in how music is distributed is the creator. If an artist wants to give away their work for free, that's their call, no…

I don't understand comments like yours and Slopos. Apple is a company, just like Johnson and Johnson and Nabisco. What possible pleasure would you get from Apple's (or any company's) stock losing value? It has no effect on you.

I'm sure someone has already said it, but nothing in this article sounds close to "Draconian", "petrifying" , "insane", "awful" or "miserable".

"I can't figure out who would ever actually need the ability to create a wireless hotspot while wearing a fancy suit or tuxedo."

Um... I think the albums by solo artists with no one on the cover are pretty easy to figure out. Deductive reasoning and all that...

"BBM would be great if my friends didn't all get iPhones... "

Sure, but "quick" doesn't have to be synonymous with "void of information"

How to write an article that says nothing: