What's going in your mouth?

McLaren Honda Civic Type R? Stranger things have happened.

So we're not allowed to have standards? Keep this in mind the next time you want to bash anything rice, stanced, or donked.

Ha, I know Group B and I know the 288 GTO. My second reply to DrunkenMessiah must be hidden in Kinja:

For a minute there, I thought you were suggesting that race-prepared cars competing in an (albeit loosely) FIA-regulated event was the same as a rare production car haphazardly careening across a random pasture.

"Ride of the Valkyries" is classical music for people who only know one classical music arrangement.

It doesn't make it right. Also, nice handle.

Sports cars are intended to be driven or tracked. Taking a rare Ferrari and drifting it all over uneven grass fields and poor-quality roads is abuse.

Calm down. And there's a difference between the calculated risk of driving (or as you would say, DRIVING) and powersliding up a narrow dirt embankment within spitting distance of trees. Agreed, Ferraris were built for one and only one expressed purpose, but that purpose is not off-road hooning.

I believe in "one exhaust outlet per cylinder bank," but a car with 168 hp/L can earn an exemption.

Reminds me of the Audi TT convertible, but better.

Look for these cars to appear on the roads in an unspecified time frame that ranges from tomorrow to the day when Cerberus rules the Earth. One or the other.

They were like a torquey, throaty, more American Civic. I loved mine when it was running well. Few cars get high 15s in the quarter mile and 40 mpg on the street.

The ZX2s were too.

Russian Ice Shifter Karting: Where a kid can be a kid!

If a company — a cold, calculating, greedy company — is willing to keep building sports cars without regard for the bottom line, then you can be damn well sure there's some relevancy there.

I thought we decided that in-wheel motors are a bad thing. Increase in unsprung weight, they can't handle the shock, etc.

My favorite part is the relevance of your handle.