Oh no.....NO NET NEUTRALITY!?!?

@gordeaux: Yes it does.

@wahrugene1: I'd have to agree. Being a female does not give you any more license to be a complete and total prick than if you are a male.

Oh gee, what a shock.

@jayntampa: Actually I'm going in the opposite direction.

@couchcommando: Yes yes I know that in torchlight there aren't really super strict "classes" per se.

@arionfrost: This is not a reversion; a reversion would imply that there is an objective retrogression in some capacity.

Please add monks as a class.

@sereal: Indeed, why the heck is this even news?

I like that this story appeared as the same day as the "What's wrong with JRPGs" story.

@JoeVampire: To add to that point I fully agree that a HUGE part of the problem with JRPGs is that the characters across games (even from different developers) are almost essentially the exact same persons. I am sick and tired of the main character being something to the effect of a 15-16 year old looking androgynous…

AMNIOS looks amazing!! I don't care what the game is; when you're airplane is also a dinosaur skull then it really does not matter.

...........so let me see if I understand this correctly.

Arbitrary patent laws......IN ACTION!!!

"Filmed in JITTERVISION!!!"

@Walking Eye!:The Business-Casual Gamer: I was about to say:

@VyseTheQuick: In this context they do not differ in the least because we are talking ideas, knowledge, patterns of information. They are all non-scarce resources and thus differ radically than scarce ones.

@TurtleSoup: I am not familiar with HAVE online.

@Gantz: Your Trusted Friend in Science.: See my post to "stridehayasa".

@Striderhayasa - Can we get some damn m/kb support?!: Why on earth should they have "originals chops" when they are only now building up their industry to begin with?