sleepyjean
SleepyJean
sleepyjean

A couple of quotation marks would have done wonders for the readability of your OP.

They are just following our actual president’s suffragette style

The guy has never done a day’s work in his life, either. He just surrounds himself with yes men who are willing to take the blame when trump fucks something up. He’s a boss, not a leader.

Literally nothing he has said since being elected hasn’t confirmed what we knew the whole time, that Donald Trump is a neophyte who has never actually done any hard thinking in his life, and whose only previous hard job was deciding which model he was going to hit on once he named them a winner.

Man, Tony Bourdain has a type, doesn’t he?

Wait, why is he interviewing dictators for a position in his cabinet?!?!

The link is actually a useful reply. But most people asking the question I did aren’t going to use the search terms you did, which is why “Just Google it” is still a pretty terrible response.

Someone needs to make a comprehensive post of who this guy is with a ton of links to him saying whatever it is he says that’s so monstrous, because my world is divided between people who love him and people who think he’s the reincarnation of Hitler, and seriously I’d never heard of him until like six months ago, and

He’s a material threat.

Any leader who calls a free and independent press “the enemy of the people” is an existential threat to democracy.

T****’s handshakes are all clench-and-pull. His elbow is always tucked in tight to his body. That’s some bullshit insecure masculinity/business power move to literally knock people off balance.

The other lawyers I know have been remarking about how Trump reminds us of that client who’s sure everything will be fine if we would just let him talk directly to the judge and work things out.

skim heads

also, skim.

It’s to get rid of protesters and to get the police, bit by bit, under executive control. Like in a dictatorship.

I’m so confused about this. Didn’t they NOT kill the guy they were trying to kill, but kill a bunch of kids? What about that is supposed to be a win?

Well, if the intent was to murder a bunch of civilians and children, lose a service-member and an Osprey... then it was a resounding success!

I saw this earlier. This is a direct move to get rid of the protestors. DIRECT. Police will instigate excessive force or will claim the person is resisting and will arrest people en masse.

Ryan died on a winning mission

Trump has only the best glass houses though.