sleepyjean
SleepyJean
sleepyjean

I, too, have had a fantastic experience with a chiropractor who was not one of those woo-woo types but a well-trained manual medical practitioner. A combo of adjustments and deep tissue massage really helped me with bad back pain. I wouldn’t go to a chiropractor who tried to convince me all disease is related to

One person may get a scholarship. That is it.

I am of two minds about this. I work at an independent all-boys school. I’m not an educator (I work in communications) but I have seen firsthand how a single-gender learning environment can actually be really beneficial to both boys and girls. For example, at my school, the boys are encouraged to become the best

Get out of here with your reasonableness! It ruins my ability to be outraged!

It is about binge drinking. If you actually read the infographic, it talks specifically about women who drink “too much” and defines what “too much” means. The infographic goes on to recommend that physicians assess female patients for binge drinking and make recommendations to women who fit the above criteria.

Yes! Can we just call a spade a spade - men who get really angry about women “withholding” sex are basically arguing for their right to rape us.

Don’t forget the cannibalism! Christ is delicious.

Call me a nutso pinko commie, but yes. Regulate the shit out of this. Unfettered development will only benefit the rich. Everyone gets squeezed (not just the deeply impoverished) when cities don’t put some serious regulations down about what kind of development can happen.

That’s because the right light isn’t being shed. The investment isn’t focused on what those poor people actually need, which is often basic amenities and infrastructure (grocery stores, schools, community/cultural centres, transit, businesses that pay decent wages to low-income earners etc.). Not all development is

Yup. Community revitalization for the actual people who live in those neighbourhoods is not about luxury retailers and condos. It’s about basic amenities and infrastructure that make the community livable and safe. That’s not gentrification.

See, I’ve always thought of “gentrification” as exactly this kind of development that pays little attention to how impoverished people are displaced during the process of “improvement.” Development that does take into account affordability and social/economic justice isn’t gentrification (in this pejorative sense). I

Then you need to talk to other men about gender-based violence and work towards deconstructing the culture of toxic masculinity that enables such violence, not blame women for responding in legitimate ways based on their lived experience of that violence.

That’s a bummer. North American lingerie manufacturers seem to be under the impression that D is the highest cup size a woman can have. If they really want to promote body diversity, they should recognize that more women than they think wear larger sizes, and provide a more diverse product line that takes into account

Yes, there definitely is such a thing as an F cup and more (North American) bra manufacturers need to start making it.

I actually had to stop watching it because I was so utterly repulsed by his voice.

The “model as coat hanger” argument is so dumb. Because even if the clothing isn’t practical, it’s still clothing and not simply textile art. It’s supposed to be wearable, that’s the whole point. If they want to showcase the clothes on hangers, use hangers, don’t use actual human bodies. I mean, doesn’t it speak

Do they have bras that go past a D-cup, though? I’d love to get some bras that are cute and comfy and not a bazillion dollars each, but I’m a 30G.

Starring for your last sentence.

I am so glad I’m not the only one who has that problem! It inevitably starts poking out when I have to...bear down. And do you find that your urine stream is lighter when you’re wearing the cup? It’s almost as if your urethra is being compressed.

But a DivaCup’s actually got to be cleaned.