“I’d never played more than a few minutes of Crusader of Centy”

I’m curious, do you operate on the assumption that comment section are the equivalent of screaming into the void? i.e. Do you comment with no expectation of conversation?

I read this article and thought “ah a mobile game. I won’t be playing this.”

I didn’t realize San Andreas came out in 1999! Learn something new every day.

“Best part of San Andreas is leaving San Andreas” headline is confusing. Read entire article to find out why the best part of San Andreas was being taken away. Only after finishing did I finally read the headline properly. Sort of like an M. Night twist, but revealed right at the beginning, but only understandable at…

But if you do cheat by looking up puzzles online, the least fun-ruining way is this web site: http://www.uhs-hints.com/hints/

Now I want it to be named ‘Modern W4rfare’.

I’m actually furious they didn’t replace a letter with a number.

The reason why everyone is so upset is not because of the decision Dany made, but WHY she did and HOW she got to that point. I don’t doubt the book will end similarly, but it will more clear why Dany decides to ransack King’s Landing and become the “Mad Queen”.

Really stupid.

Bear in mind that most people complaining about the recent episode(s) are not focused on what happened, but HOW it happened. Which is to say, rushed, under-explained, and illogical. I was enormously disappointed in the last episode’s writing, but I happen to also think that most of the same basic things will occur in…

The ending will be the same on a surface level for sure. I fully believe Dany going full mad queen was always GRRM’s intent.

I also believe that when he finally writes it it will actually make sense and be much more satisfying.

lmao ok.

You should listen to the podcast, but short version: There’s a big difference between burning down the Red Keep and indiscriminately killing civilians. This would be a whole different conversation if Daenerys had gone straight for Cersei, killing innocents in her quest to kill the woman who usurped the throne and…

Abe’s Exodus and Stranger’s Wrath were definitely bonus games, but I’m pretty sure Munch’s Oddysee was the second part of the quintology.

They were intentional. Three sets of four, all marked and nothing else in the deck marked. Each set had identical markings that were distinct from the other two sets. The sleeves were brand new and had only been used in a couple games.

If all the lands had been marked identically, or all had been marked randomly, that might be plausible. But the marks were specific enough to identify which specific card was present. Three sets of marks, distinct, on only the three cards (each a playset of four) most critical to the deck’s function? That cannot…

Right?! The thing is

It’s definitely gotta be the people who think they are above it all and scoff at the ideas of spoiler/anyone who would care about it. An insufferable and arrogant crowd.

Or: a bunch of people who like the character and dislike seeing him rendered as a hideous monster.