I think the tone and the language the author uses indicate a pretty heavy bias against the intelligence community—heavy enough that he’s not willing to examine their motivations beyond “it must be sinister, because the intelligence community is scary and has done bad things.” It’s an understandable view but not an…

Until he is convicted his is innocent though that’s the idea of the sentence, until you can prove that he did it why would you assume that he has? This kind of mindset you have is extremely dangerous.

Do you honesty think he hacked anyone? Do you even know how Wikileaks works? “putting their private SS numbers on line” This is a lie, there vet each document and release only information that will not lead anyone to direct harm or release confidential personal information.

“literally all of our intelligence and law enforcement agencies have identified Russia as the source of the hack”

How can you possibly claim to know his intention?

unequal transparency in a democratic election

How many of those emails have you actually read? It most certainly did give us transparency about things like U.S. involvement with ISIS, Bernie Sanders having the primaries rigged, media collision or at least several “off the record” dinners with much of the MSM. The public certainly deserves to know that stuff.

Prison for what? Advocating prison for an innocent man and his has 22 likes. Wow it’s so ironic that people who call Trump “Literal Hitler” are advocating jailing innocent people who talk against the people they support.

Just playing devil’s advocate here how many emails did you actually go through and read? There was a ton of bizzare stuff mentioned and I’m not even talking about pizzagate which goes against innocent until proven guilty.

Propaganda at its finest. Do people honestly believe that the U.S. public would be better of not have the transparency brought by Wikileaks?

Umm no I just gave you the way they validate their leaks. You claimed that “This has nothing to do with whether or not the files being leaked to them are authentic, it’s an email security protocol you dunce” when it is the verifiable way we have of knowing any emails released were actually send and not tampered with…

Read the article I posted, the first line, “Domain Keys Identified Mail, or DKIM, is a highly regarded email security system that can be used to independently authenticate the contents and sender of an email that uses it.” “ DKIM has the beneficial side-effect of causing messages to become “cryptographically…

sorry DKIM I misspelled it https://wikileaks.org/DKIM-Verification.html but please like I said name a single thing they have released that is untrue. I’ll wait...

Name a single thing they have released that is untrue. You can’t. EVERYTHING they release is 100% verified by Google D.K.M.S. algorithms, a single false release and there entire credibility would be destroyed.

You do realize that Trump is the first president to openly support gay marriage coming into Office right and even Hillary didn’t support gay marriage until it was legalized right?

And yet you get rid of California, which doesn’t have voter ID btw, and that turns into a 1.7 million Trump lead just saying... They both played the same game.

You laughter shows you have no argument against what I am saying and deep down you know it to be true. Did you even watch the video it was a 5 year detailed forensic investigation? it doesn’t matter now but it goes to show that you should be questioning everything. We are all part of a sick game being controlled by…

What your doing is reducing all criticisms of Obama the two he’s not a citizen and “he’s a Muslim” which is not what any rational person on the right is saying. It’s the equivalent of the people on the left claimed called bush lowest IQ of any American President of the last 50 years which was proven false or comparing…

You should really get off your high horse, maybe, just maybe insulting people who disagree with you is a big part of why Trump got elected. And hoping for these “consequences” aka your own country to fail is a big part of the problem...

I see things pretty clearly I have no stake in either side, you are clearly lost in your confirmation bias/the narratives that the media has regurgitated for the past year. The same media (NYT,WaJo,NBC,CNN,politico,Vice,guardian,etc) that colluded with Hillary Clinton/CF according to Wikileaks look of CTR or Obama’s…