@ChaoZ: Dhiaa's an XBox, and you're more Atari.

I've done the research so you don't have to:

@qwed88: Why exactly did you put an apostrophe in there?

@bluSCALE4: "Cable services, you look marvellous?"

@raj: One time cost of zillions, sure.

@hastyp: It's a good idea: put some more batteries in your trunk for a long drive and swap for fresh along the way. Supposedly a Tesla Motors store will be able to swap the Tesla Model S pack.

@DarkerBlitz and all you clueless folk: You need to master the dark arts of physics and mathematics!

@jesusplzhelp: A DC fast charger like the $19,000 one Nissan is putting in 200 dealerships will recharge a Nissan Leaf to 80% of charge in 30 minutes. That's still more inconvenient than pumping explosive liquid into your tank in 7 minutes, but a lot better than 2 hours.

@djdare: "some music needs a great producer, or engineer to really shine"

@Jamsian:

@jetRink: Now you've peaked my interest, you need take the reigns with this idea! Dont hit the breaks or tow the line, that's just begging the question of why everyone else writes so badly.

@Michael Ashley

@Frankenbike666: Your statement assumes people won't ever buy a car that takes longer than 5 minutes to fill up. That's bizarre.

@Purdueable: I was thinking that. In a taxi, press L3 for nitrous than R3 for a bunny hop just before a bridge. Good times! Not so much in real life.

"We wanted to make the big jump," he [AMG boss] told me. "As an industry, we need to be more proactive."

@ReticulatedJig: The Clarity is an electric car with a battery recharged by an expensive technology with zero existing infrastructure that will require billions to develop.

@Wunno Sev: I was once a passenger in a sky blue TVR Griffith convertible, very loud and rumbly and special. A rugby fan yelled out "Oy mate, nice penis extender!" In response the classy TVR driver smiles and shrugs.

@Julius Seizure - Proud Canuck:

@nickles: That's why I pointed to other summaries, and every single statement in the Wikipedia article is cited up the wazoo in its References section, unlike denialist crap on other sites. Can you actually say what's wrong with the consensus instead of doubting it? It's based on a basic undeniable physical…

@Cromwell: You're confused. The camp with nearly all the climate scientists and the endorsement of every academy of science is beset with much disagreement, reflected in the last IPCC summary: "global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 1.1 to 6.4 °C (2.0 to 11.5 °F) during the 21st century."