'The majority’s decision is an act of will, not legal judgment.'
'The majority’s decision is an act of will, not legal judgment.'
'No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies
the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice,
and family. In forming a marital union, two people become
something greater than once they were. As some of
the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage
embodies a love that may endure even past…
'Marriage responds to the universal fear that a lonely person might call out only to find no one there. It offers the hope of companionship and understanding and assurance that while both still live there will be someone to care for the other.'
Not ashamed to say I am crying right now.
SPOILER ALERT! But that is awesome.
I am not up to that and for some reason am going to read the entire opinions, but I look forward to seeing some judicial trolling.
Here's the Opinion of the Court and four - that's right four - dissents:
5-4. Congrats, America.
The Chevron Defence has its ideological limitations, that is true. But I always felt that this was going to rule for the ACA - I'm sorry, I can't call a name that to me is tainted and an act of manipulation.
This is oddly moving - from his dissent:
From the Scotusblog: 'From Scalia's dissent: "We should start calling this law SCOTUScare'.
Awwww. I could barely draw any of them …
Alex! Long time, no see!
Like fish to sharks, Australians are friends not food/comedy bait.
Tales of Australian Media recapping American television recaps: Todd gets the first mention!
Just going to leave this here:
I really shouldn't have fallen into the spiral of playing twenty again cause now all I'm going to do on my 4 hour train home is try and get better than 20x19.
It's so consuming I haven't even gotten around to that yet!
Wow these Twitter and Facebook things are verrrrrrrrrrrrrry time consuming.