skepticalchef
SkepticalChef
skepticalchef

I will never not star the use of the much underutilized “jabroni.”

Haha, true. When I saw it today I assumed it was from a parody account. Nope.

She’s vile. I think the cherry on my rage sundae was this tweet from the Mooch, which roughly translates to “honey, you’re so homely I’ll personally pay for your glam squad if we are putting you in front of the cameras again”:

Oooo, that’s a good point re using Verizon’s network. Good lawyering. Counterpoint: if you violate the Verizon terms of service they can deny you service. Although that is different factually from the ability of an individual user on Twitter to block another for any reason. I am clearly too lazy to look up the

Bahahaha, well played, that actually made me chuckle out loud. Much needed today.

Yes x 1000. And Pence. This has his desiccated fingerprints all over it. I’m flashing back to that smug interview he gave to some morning show talking about his “religious freedom” bill so businesses can refuse service to gay people.

His proclamation on Twitter today was even more horrific than usual. I’ve been so fired up all day. I mean, announcing this (bigoted, unjustified, the list goes on) policy via Twitter without giving the Pentagon a warning or any logistics worked out? The level of disrespect to active service members who are now in

That’s the argument I’ve seen advanced. I’m only partially following the case, but the counter argument I’ve seen is that Twitter is unlike a Congressional office blocking calls because it is hosted on a private platform, and have their own terms of service. However, given that policy seems to be disseminated over

Seriously, it seems Pentagon has been referring requests for comment to WH. So, what happens to openly serving transgender service members TODAY? Presumably, their safety may be more at risk, for starters. But are they forced on a plane? If they leave of their own accord are they considered going AWOL? Has the Trump

True - there is a colorable argument. But does Twitter constitute a public forum?

There is a lawsuit filed about just that...dubious that it has merit, but it’s possible:

There was a short-lived reality show called “Jump!” that aired within the past year that was about double dutch/competitive jump rope. It was a blast to watch what those kids could do.

Chomp! Got your ear, mom! I love this baby hippo. 5/5, is a very good hippo.

I hadn’t seen Rachel’s tweet about her response to Peter having been edited so much, I wonder what her full explanation was. Good to know it was edited, I like Rachel a lot and that scene was the first time she gave me pause because she sounded like she had a single-minded determination to get engaged, just for the

Yes - he’s not a winner by any means, but he seems to have some basic level understanding of the gravity of the office he has.

To be clear, I am not saying he was a good pick, has relevant experience, or is doing a good job. I was just saying that a lot of the other Trump appointees are so bad they make him look not as bad. Re: the minimal effort I mentioned (note: minimal, I wasn’t endorsing him), the attempt at diplomacy in Qatar comes to

I know who he is and that he came from Exxon. I was just remarking that of the truly terrible group Trump assembled, by comparison, Tillerson hasn’t been as bad as most.

And yet, out of all the knucklehead Trump appointees, I often find myself thinking Tillerson isn’t *that* bad. He at least shows minimal interest in learning about his post.

Exactly! Grooming aside, what does he think he helped her with?! She was already a Kardashian/Jenner, he was whatever a Tyga is.

It is also one of my all-time favorite celebrity pads. That entryway.