sirhoracedarwin
SirHoraceDarwin
sirhoracedarwin

Fucking finally.

At this point, though, the guy has literally 0 advocates or friends. If they convict him in the Berman case (they should, but who knows), investigators all over the country should start making him an "unofficial suspect" in all their unsolved murders. Just say "yeah we don't have much evidence, but it was probably

Yes, but I eugenics might be one of the cases where it looks great on paper, but it is improperly implemented (see Marxism as another example) and taints the whole thing. Also, I think as we have gotten a better understanding of the brains and bodies, we've started to learn how diversity actually strengthens our

I love his misspelling in "Your an idiot."

But they're providing competition, which is the key. Now, I can call Comcast and say "I can sign up for Playstation Vue and get X channels for $50/month, no contract. What can you do for me"? That wasn't much of an option before.

I don't think it does, though. Because if your cable company started offering you a-la-carte channel access, you wouldn't be cutting the cord. People are conflating the two on this comment thread and its driving me nuts.

You understand, though, that the channels most people want are the expensive ones, right? Just because your cable company gives you 200 channels and you pay $100/month doesn't mean that each channel costs 50 cents. There was an analysis a few years ago that said ESPN alone adds close to $20/month to the average cable

I think you maybe took my comment a bit too literally, or I misspoke. Instead of "cable TV service" I should have said "paid TV-only service". "Cord cutting" is the idea that you're getting your "TV" content over the internet. I think you're conflating "cord cutting" and a-la-carte TV service, which are completely

This is still good, though, because your cable provider now has some more competition to deal with, whereas previously they had none. This will help keep their prices in check.

I've always interpreted "cutting the cord" or "cord cutters" to mean you're not paying for cable TV service. Internet access via the cable company or some other entity is a given.

You should still consider this a good thing, though, because its helping keep Comcast's prices in check. In a country where cable competition is woefully lacking, this is good.

How is it not? The term "cord-cutting" refers to ditching cable tv while still getting the channels you want.

$40 is a lot less than those would cost, just for the content. Showtime and HBO alone are close to that, and you need cable. Your local cable company (probably Comcast) has exactly the service you want, but it'll cost you like $150/month (internet included).

While I probably agree with much of the article I didn't read at all

The variables are woefully lacking in explanation.

I let it run with a 0.00 kill to bite ratio and zombie speed of 1 mile per 1 time unit (is that minutes?) and started in new york and the simulation stopped/ran out at 527 hours with Las Vegas and El Paso being the only major cities surviving. Yuma and Bend also seemed to survive.

I've been thinking this for years.

As a niner fan, Patrick Willis' retirement was a sad day, but I was reassured by the fact that we had a new, young player who seemed to fill Patty's shoes pretty well. Now we just have a glaring hole in the middle of the field that needs to be addressed ASAP.

You're using some pretty aggressive wording to describe your laziness for setting up an account.