No reason not to make it live. It doesnt affect the rest of the game. People will either play it or they wont. And gives players something to do while waiting for the next expansion.
No reason not to make it live. It doesnt affect the rest of the game. People will either play it or they wont. And gives players something to do while waiting for the next expansion.
while the fixes are good, they should have fixed them before release. Tired of being an unpaid beta tester
That’s not really the point though. Its that they promise something, then abandoned it. And then they promised something else, and are probably going to abandon it too.
It’d be a bit silly if they said it takes place in the same world as Icewind Dale.
To anyone who thinks 9 should be higher, let me just remind you: Hilgigars exists.
They’ve been working on Elder Scrolls 6 for years. Todd Howard has said so a couple times, when someone caught him off guard by asking about it in between questions about Starfield.
Screw EA. They sent me some DMCA bullshit for downloading a game. I didn’t, so that alone would’ve annoyed me. But the game they claimed I downloaded was Sims 4. And I take that as a personal insult.
Valve can’t do anything. All they offer is a platform. if someone wants their game removed, it gets removed.
“Our Customer Service team will be informed of the retirement date and equipped with prepared responses should users reach out”
I was hoping that somehow, Sephiroth would end up taking over as lead from Cloud. I didn’t exactly know how this could possibly happen, it would take a lot of time shenanigans to pull off, but I was still hoping.
The thing is though, they made a mistake that many devs have known about for a long time: Do not nerf unless you absolutely cannot avoid it. Buff everything else if you have to, but do not nerf anything. Even if the result is identical, nerfing something gets way more negative responses than buffing things.
I think trying to make Loveless into a thing was ridiculous. You only saw a handful of signs about it, and it didn’t need explanation. It was there to make the world feel alive outside of what your characters are doing.
Square Enix, not Square. Nobody in charge of Square Enix was ever with Square.
Why would they need to let him grow? he’s just going to be there to fly an airship or whatever.
Yet more characters who can’t be used, because Square Enix has no idea what they’re doing. Oh well. At least he wasnt demoted to a character that is only there for the computer to fight itself.
Man, screw EA. Just yesterday they sent me some DMCA crap saying i downloaded a game illegally. I didn’t, but that’s not the issue. its that they accused me of downloading Sims 4.
when the recent Cult of the Lamb DLC was being promoted, people kept jokingly referring to it as the “sex patch.” After a while, the devs said that if they got another 20,000 followers on Twitter by the end of the year, they would add sex into the game.
Im always afraid to share any negative opinions with a dev, because of people like this. Eve nthough i try to be respectful and explain my problem like a real person would, I worry i’ll get lumped in with the jerks.
I still don’t get the appeal of having computer controlled characters. it just seems like the game is fighting itself. I mean if its not going to let you control more than 1 character, why even have more than 1 character?
If anyone buys this game they are an idiot.