Everyone thinks it's funny that Blockbuster still exists.

I went with the PS4 for the simple fact that it supports Remote Play with the Vita. Had Microsoft produced a portable with some good standalone titles for said portable, it might have played out completely different, especially since Kinect is no longer required.

To my fellow PS Vita owners who are purchasing a PS4, or have tried Remote Play with their PS3;

Need some help with Vita > PS3 remote play folks, please help!

Steambox seems promising. The biggest thing that bugs non-nerd consumers is they can't be bugged with the task of upgrading hardware in the first place. You've got to keep in mind that 99% of their user base throws the console in a dusty, un-ventilated entertainment center for 8 years, and expect it to "just work".…

Lol, I have a beast of a gaming rig, running an OC i7, 4.0 GHz (with a cinder block of a heat sink), 16 GB 1700 MHz GDDR3 RAM, and a GeForce 760.

1998 called. They want their compact discs back. And DLNA can be added with a software update. I imagine support for CD playback could as well, since it is a Blu-Ray drive.

Yeah, EXTERNAL drives. Internal drives are just as easy to swap as before. Simply remove one of the plates, Phillips screw, remove the second Phillips screw securing the hard drive, reinsert the new drive, put the screws back in, power on the console, format the drive, done. Entire process takes like 2 minutes. And so…

The point that I'm trying to make is that you're trying to say that the human eye cannot detect the difference between 30 FPS and 60 FPS. This simply is not true. Myself, as well as most other gamers and folks to enjoy high fidelity and frame rates can quite easily tell the framerate of something, even if not told the…

True, but 39 fps is at the low end of the spectrum.

Or, you could just expand it with a larger hard drive....just as you can on a PC....

Lol. Your "I have no idea what I'm talking about" is still showing. Ask any optometrist. The human eye can, and does see beyond 60 "fps". It's been researched, and it's found that our average eyes are closer to 120-130 "fps", even more for some people.

I agree with literally every other post here. These videos are awful, Kotaku. Please stop posting them. :/

I'm simply appalled by the hypocrisy of the comments on this post.

So effectively a $300 PS4? Not bad.

Well fuck me sideways. If this turns out to be true, the only game I will have on launch is Battlefield. Yayyyyy....

Anyone got a link for a re-up? The video is now "private", le sigh.

I play an MMO which once had a glitch, and my one of my buddies have invisible arms due to a rare clothing glitch. They patched the bug for any time it occurs in the future, however it was not retroactive, so he got to keep his invisible arms hahah.

Have you tried getting tattoos on your arms to try to get them to appear again? A buddy of mine did this and got his arms back, but I suppose it might not always work. I suppose the alternative would be that you have tattoos floating around your waist, just looking like one glitchy mess.

You're right, sadly enough.