Pray tell, why on earth would they need to go three levels beyond a single person, in the name of terrorism?
Pray tell, why on earth would they need to go three levels beyond a single person, in the name of terrorism?
So you don't think it's likely that at some point, some guy with bad intentions could perhaps sell this information to someone? Or just give it away for free to someone else with bad intentions?
Have you ever played Payday 2? It was just released and its scope is massive. There are literally hundreds of different ways to approach each mission. Go in guns blazing, or take it slow and quiet and escape without a peep (stealth is near-impossible with folks online going in with guns with no silencers...sigh...)
Personally, I play (and I'm quite skillful) in both titles. You're entirely right. There are points in BF 3 that you're using for cover, and then the WHOLE FUCKING WALL goes out, and you have to completely re-think your tactics. Makes it a more fun, and more realistic game, and helps alleviate camping to a certain…
You're completely right. We all know that corruption in the United States does not exist, so there is no way there could possibly be one guy with a gold mine of information with the wrong intentions.
There are ways around the 64 bit issue with wrappers, that's really a non-issue.
Perhaps not THE forerunner, but there never is just one king to rule them all.
You've forgot to mention Logic Pro X. Logic continues to be a forerunner in sound production, and [Apple] are even expanding on it's "pro"-ness with a whole slew of new features.
I never said that it was a bad console. In fact if you check out my other posts about the 360 on Gizmodo or Kotaku, I actually mention that I think it's a fine console. I just wouldn't want to allow the possibility of stuff like this to happen in my home. But Microsoft changed even this policy as well, so it's a…
Right now? Supposedly nothing. But that doesn't stop them from doing something terrible with it in the future. One corrupt asshole can ruin it for the bunch.
But before, it previously DID require it to ALWAYS be plugged in. Microsoft was giving everyone's information to the feds without warrant. What was there to stop them, previously, with doing the some with Kinect audio and video, even if it was disabled in the settings? People were turning off location data and stuff…
You have no idea how close you are to what actually happens. (;
Meh. Too much, too late. If Microsoft would have had all of these 180's from the get-go, rather than changing their ENTIRE vision for the console, I would have gone with the One rather than the PS4. But it's too late for me now. I've already purchased another year of PS Plus, and have my PS4 pre-order secured, as well…
They are two completely different people. It would be like saying "Yeah, Bill Gates is a good guy, but what about Isaac Newton? Much better guy!".
Digging in the archives I see! :p
True that. There is a market for sports, so athletes get paid an absurd amount of money, because money is made.
I personally enjoyed, Butterfly Effect, in which he was 100% serious. I truly don't understand Gizmodo's hating for Kutcher. I've been stoked on this movie since it was announced (and even rumored), and I'll be watching it day 1.
Well, good luck with that buddy.
Yeahhhhh I see what's going on here. You don't have a law degree, because your maturity doesn't match your alleged intelligence.
"I can say that because the the kinect 2.0 is a much more sophisticated piece of tech than the ps camera, that's just FACT."