i haven’t changed anything.. from the beginning i said a blue falcon is a blue falcon regardless of the medium.. i’m saying a game or out of it.. is no difference. such a person is never to be trusted.

so basically you are saying your job is to steal information no matter how you get it? by hacking or buying stolen information from leakers or other hackers? that is journalism now? or game reviewers?

so basically you are saying your job is to steal information no matter how you get it? by hacking or buying stolen information from leakers or other hackers? that is journalism now? or game reviewers?

and yet what side is constantly trying to stop free speech? i hear the left all the time saying “free speech.. so long as you say what we want you to say”

well if they make that decision then don’t be surprised then if the game companies do something to try to clamp down on such leaks happening in the future. you build your house and live in it. and that applies to both sides since game companies clamping down on information or when they release review copies will…

you ever think actions by both sides lead to this? have i said it is all one person’s fault or all the other person’s fault. there are some good reasons for both sides having their positions. very few people are actually looking for a way in which both might benefit .. too busy saying your fault or.. your fault change…

yeah.. because game reviewers are the same as the press out there >.>

and you already have proof unless you are saying Harry Potter is just an AI.. someone on the other side of the keyboard made the decision to betray his teammates.

i think that might have a part in it i think both sides know it.. but if you are working on something and you aren’t ready for a conference and there is no guarantee they will be ready when a leaker gets the information out and reviewers run with it.. well it can cause a problem.

this is about game reviewers not the free press. and don’t act like President Obama didn’t spend 8 years attacking the press as well.. Fox in particular.

don’t act like MSNBC isn’t all in for the democrats.

you say that like both sides don’t do the same things.

look again.. i’m saying that it isn’t just the game companies and i should remind you.. Kotaku is basically like the game companies. Kotaku is a business which looks to make a profit no different than the game companies. the products may be different but the end goal is the same.

let’s not pretend reporting on games is anywhere close to journalism. they are reporting but i’d hardly put the two together.

i could see a problem if the insider signed a confidentiality agreement. then yes that is a problem and as bad as someone hacking into the system.

it’s like you don’t even understand what i’m saying.

you know what.. let’s go your way.. where people don’t have choicses and don’t go.. well maybe this isn’t the way to go.. nope in your world they have only one choice.. that’s it.

are you completely stupid? the they agreed to be on the team to protect the ship and then betrayed said group to destroy ship. what part of betrayal does that not mean to you?

yeah figured.. but what you stated points out why bethesda has the policies they do.. no reason to be surprised at that. sure it got them clicks but it also poisoned the well so to speak.

or maybe both sides have something from it.. think about that?