The number of studies performed has very little to do with the data available for us to study!!! How do you not understand this distinction?! You supposedly work in “science” and yet you don’t understand the significance of sample sizes???

As I mentioned numerous times, the LACK of data is the issue.

Please read the whole comment before hitting reply next time...

Please read the links that were posted at least 3 other times. I am speaking of COMMERCIAL VEHICLES OPERATING IN CALIFORNIA.

Also, there are different and specific rules regarding registrations of out-of-state vehicles in CA. You can also see those in the links. There are also a few exemptions (like limited-miles…

Counter Point: If you’re that worried about leg room for yourself, buy an upgraded seat with more space; don’t be a dick.

I deal with science every day in my work as an engineer... I assure you, you would not like the same methods and approaches taken in the field of “climate science” applied to things like machines, houses, bridges, etc...

If it affects interstate commerce, then its the Fed’s jurisdiction. Period. There are cases in the courts right now that will decide this.

“New” (recent) data doesn’t tell us much. (Again, go back to the piston analogy.) And data that is “GENERATED” is predisposed to bias and manipulation. Generated/interpolated data cannot be held in the same vein as observed/measured data.

What data samples do you think we have that predate life???

You’re kidding yourself, right?

You’re citing an article count as “proof”? What are you, an ad-bot?

You say you don’t lie to your patients, but yet you posted an example in which you overstate your certainty of a treatment’s effectiveness and downplay the unknown risks and uncertainties, so???

I do, actually, but if you’d like to show the formula and data/values you think contradict my claim, by all means, post it up!

...There are brilliant scientists rigorously studying this every single day and reporting their findings...

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/cash-flow-corner/meeting-california-truck-regulations

Let’s try short sentences; may be you can understand those?

That “mountain” of data is STATISTICALLY IRRELEVANT!!! Your “mountain” isn’t even a mole hill!

Sure, that’s California’s stance...

Yes, it is most certainly abstract. We don’t have enough data to say it is anything less than circumstantial right now. Please go read a statistics book...

But that won’t make anyone feel better about themselves and it will just piss everyone off even more...