I think what Marilyn’s ghost was trying to say is “For fuck’s sake, no more shitty goddamned movies about me, please?”
I think what Marilyn’s ghost was trying to say is “For fuck’s sake, no more shitty goddamned movies about me, please?”
There’s a time and place to, rightly, criticize the monarchy and the royal family.
He’s undoubtedly Truthing up something about how she had tears in her eyes when she met him and told him what a good job he was doing.
You know he is trying to angle his way into that funeral. I am sure all able former Presidents will go, except Trump. He will not be invited and he will melt down on his failing Twitter clone.
Also agreed.
Oh good, I am glad that I am not the only one who felt like that.
Thank you. I agree.
The tone of this entire article is disgusting.
Oh. FFS. Give the axe grinding and bad faith a rest for five seconds and engage with what is actually being written in the article.
Wow, how easy it must be for you to talk about destroying the instruments ooppression rom behind your phone. America is rife with contradictions and to easily dismiss those nuances makes you look like a fool. She's changed the conversation and inspired a new generation of progressive activists. Sorry she wasn't able…
Indeed. for all the right-wing fear mongering about “sharia law coming to Americe” ... I only see one religious group trying to stuff their beliefs down everyone’s pants.
JFC!! What about people who contract HIV other than from homosexual activity? I thought Christians were all about forgiveness? Withholding prevention and killing people? I’m sure God and Jesus are so proud.
Those criticisms were (and are) valid, though. The democratic party apparatus has pretty open disdain for the progressive part of its caucus.
Man, I hope American democracy survives long enough to elect this woman president.
There is nothing in the Koran suggesting gay people should be killed. Homophobia among Muslims is the same as homophobia among Christians. It’s just straight-up homophobia wrapped in a bogus religious justification.
This infuriates me so much. There are so many reasons why someone would want to be on prep (imagine you’re a good christian woman and your husband is a Christ-loving former addict who seroconverted before you met him, what are your options?) and so many more. This is pure hypocritical spite.
I know it’s obvious but you don’t have to have gay sex or even any sort of sex to be infected with HIV... You can even be born with it. This is beyond infuriating and crossing into the realm of completely confusing. It’s a profoundly stupid decision, so that means we can fully expect the current Supreme Court to…
This is a terrible ruling. Not covering PrEP doesn’t prevent gay sex; it just promotes gay sickness and death. No legitimate religion has a legitimate interest in making gay people get sick and die.
Looks like in their effort to drag us back to the 1950s, they’ve made a stop in the 1980s, since they seem to believe only gay men can have HIV.
Yeah. Banning controversial conversations is simply a tool to silence the will of the people. Oh, I’m sorry* you’re uncomfortable being called out on your regressive and abusive hatred for other people ... but too goddamn bad.