sillyme8
SillyMe8
sillyme8

No, he’s a successful business man.

It takes very little to get a visa revoked, both in the States and in other countries. In the States in particular if you say ‘terrorism’ they’re going to react swiftly. No messing around.

It takes nothing to get a visa revoked these days and it takes a lot to get one that allows you to live and work in the country. Many countries are difficult this way and the hoops one must jump through can be pretty extreme. They also do not have to give any reason to deny or revoke a visa. It can be on a whim and if

There has been no substantiation of the charges and if you read the court documents it’s quite apparent that it was a ploy to get him out of the country and give her sole custody of the kids. Sucks for her that that shady plan backfired.

Also, he’s apparently great about getting the kids to Skype her regularly, sends her detailed and regular updates on their lives, pays for her to come over six times minimum a year (she’s been over more than 70 times since the ruling), etc. etc. etc. She takes the kids on pap strolls and lies to the media, who for

Yes, that’s the one that really lays out everything. She’s really fucking with her kids and has done for years. She had to be ordered repeatedly just to put the father’s name on the birth certificate.

He is unable to have his visa renewed because she got it revoked. Read the court papers and see what a sleazy move her and her lawyer pulled. Additionally, the kids have dual citizenship, so it’s not ‘Oh no! They’re making those ‘Murican kids live in a foreign country!’. The kids were enrolled in French school in NYC

I wonder what they’d look like if they had left their faces alone.

If you read the court documents it’s pretty apparent Rutherford is the cause of all her own problems.

The woman is out of her tree, as is made evident by the original ruling in California. She lied to the State Department - in fact, her and her lawyer tried to blackmail him into giving up all rights to his kids, an incident detailed in the court ruling. She bangs on about him not filing to have his visa reinstated but

How old is the wife? Because I now have hope of having passion in my dotage.

I’m a former journo and yes, if she’s going to talk about the woman’s book and the film and not discuss the big elephant in the room then she is not doing her job thoroughly or well.

Sounds like some Handmaid’s Tale nonsense to me.

The only reason I went to see the Little Mermaid was to see if Jörgen Nash really was the one who kept messing with her - he had died by then and was thought to be either the one who did it or the brains behind it. Crazy little guy and a very interesting artist.

I think you not shoplifting or engaging in that sort of compulsive and destructive behaviour does make you a better person. She’s getting off on doing illegal shit when she doesn’t need to. Me? I’d ditch the toxicity and find better people to hang out with. What she’s doing is a reflection of her character.

If I’m going to be honest when I see a picture of the Beckham’s daughter with a dummy I do stop and think ‘A bit late in the day to toss that’ but it’s a fleeting thought and I don’t much care either way. My kids never wanted or used them. One spoke pretty much out of the womb, the other had speech delay. Do what

Those questions were not asked in this particular interview, which appears on a website where many posters commented about this very topic. Because something has been addressed in another publication doesn’t mean it should not be addressed in a new interview, particularly when one considers the arena and previous

Never found him attractive and find him even less so in that extreme closeup. Damn.

Not sure how old you are but why are you hanging out with someone this fucked up? I’m guessing that crazy is just the tip of the iceberg.