Are you looking at the same pictures I am?I'd say pulling on the fabric a little would have been better for all parties, that is, if of the outcome is supposed to resemble reality more than a computer generated image. It would have the added bonus that the subject could see themselves as good enough without the need…

I don't know if it is part of her ideology not to do so, but I would think Leibovitz and all her assistants could get her to straighten her back or, if this was some kind of very respected professional photographer taking pictures for a fashion magazine, make her slouching look more glamorous, as that is what they are…

Lena Dunham and her fans, ourselves included, love her just the way she is. Vogue's opinion, of course, is another matter.

Exactly, if you cannot get your subject to pose in a photogenic manner or position the clothing so it drapes properly etc. - considering that these photos where the best from god knows how many taken - or just choose to rather correct these things digitally, it raised the question of should one's profession be called…

And/or how about pledging some of the ad money the pageviews they're doing to this for will get them? Acknowledging that there may be more than one motive for this stunt would make it at least a tad less insulting to their readership.

I went to see this film version of Wuthering Heights with my mother when it came out, and I was confused when we left the theater and noticed that she hadn't been crying, as she usually has very strong emotional reactions to films. I myself almost cried, which is quite rare for me, so I though she would have been…

Shouldn't this be a men's rights issue: Correcting the inequality of men having to do more dangerous jobs like racing, while women get to lounge around in their underwear?

Did they offer to pay for the chance to take photos? Happened to me around Beijing in the 90's as a blonde semi-Ashkenazi. Kinda creepy as a kid, especially when my parents took the money.

Maybe he wants that whale penis -feeling while knowing there remain just as many left dangling under the sea.

I would like to ask those who expressed the sentiment "I am Trayvon Martin", if they would like it if their picture was viewed over 18,000 times paired with a picture of a terrorist after your untimely death.

The RS cover has been defended from the perspective of fighting harmful stereotypes, but surely that could be done in a way that is not socially irresponsible. Martin's face deserves to be seen, while putting Tsarnaev's face at the top of your post is exactly the kind of thing that motivates people who carry out…

For the sophisticated type travelling through Eastern Europe, I'm afraid this chain of fine establishments might not be around anymore, as the company website is down.

I am familiar with his oeuvre, and I have no problems with it. On the contrary, to be honest I'll probably be one of the few people to watch The Canyons. That "news/current affairs" clip is ridiculous on a lot of levels and sexist as hell (with the exception of Deen), which is why I shared it in the first place.

His popularity is deeply disturbing (it's funny they don't talk about teen boys drooling over porn stars):

#TipForPippa: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand…

This reply is to Mike Trollsmells, because I do not want to let him out of the grey, yet I am maybe foolish in being open to the possibility that some research that goes against his beliefs might clear up some misunderstandings for him.

This is my promblem with evo-psych: the teleological way of explaining things. X thing is beneficial for the survival of our species. Why? Because we did some (methodologically questionable) test that prove X happens, and why else would X have developed.

I meant that I've been accused of saying white girls aren't allowed to rap because I've criticized Iggy before, so I put that song there so I wouldn't get replies from Iggy/Kreayshawn fans making fools of themselves.

And for every Jay-Z there's a Common Sense:

Sorry, old world/country takeover: