You’re both technically right. HBO Max did replace HBO Go/Now. However, a large portion of HBO Max’s content isn’t really connected to the old HBO brand other than having the same parent company.
You’re both technically right. HBO Max did replace HBO Go/Now. However, a large portion of HBO Max’s content isn’t really connected to the old HBO brand other than having the same parent company.
It’s because they aren’t actually touching the HBO part. It’s all been TNT, TBS, TruTV, and HBO Max.
Wait ‘til they reveal their $120 ads only subscription tier.
its not O and I its 1 and 0 (the numbers)
$105 for one year with no ads or $70 for one year without ads
I mean
Can’t believe the corporate parasite who ate the Discovery Channel and The Learning Channel (which were once actually good) from the inside out would do this.
It’s funny because that was the fear with making HBO Max in the first place. People thought putting all of HBO’s prestige programming next to shit like Big Bang Theory and The CW shows would only harm the brand. And then, instead, HBO Max had a hell of a first year or so. Everyone subscribed to it, it was a fantastic…
$770 mil for everything? That honestly seems kind of cheap.
It’s darkly hilarious that animation basically kept the entertainment industry afloat during the pandemic, and the second things start to resemble the beginning of a return to normalcy, basically every animated project in existence is taken out back and rewarded with a bullet through the back of the skull as…
boy, anyone who puts the Broly’s second outing (not dbs) that high on the list is just wrong
Final Fantasy isn’t the thing having issues with adapting, Square Enix management is the problem.
This show is going to be broomed out after one more season anyway, most likely. Warner Bros. wants to revamp the DCEU to be more competitive with the Marvel superhero juggernaut and that means big theatrical movies. Superman & Lois is just an anchor around their neck (sorry, Dr. Stein) in that respect. Look for the…
Sure, but these types of conflicts occur in every relationship, regardless of age. Different cultures, different family expectations, careers. It doesn’t make one person a predator and one an innocent lamb, like many people in this comment section want to believe.
So, which is it, women’s brains or people’s brains? Also, it’s not like it’s a switch that flips on the day you turn 25. Florence was still an adult when they started dating. Is there any evidence that Zach groomed her?
Regardless of how you are positioning this, it takes all of the agency from Pugh. She consented to date him. For all we know, she pursued him, and not the other way around. To suggest that men dating younger women is a matter of wanting inequitable relationships suggests that the women in those relationships are just…
Why does an older person of any gender have to date within a specific range, as long as the other party is a consenting adult?
Forget reproductive choices, if women aren’t fully developed adults until 25, that means no more entering into contracts without a parent or guardian cosigning, or full-time work.
No, no, it’s only soft, ladybrains that aren’t capable of thought until age 30 or so.
Yeah, I love coming to Jezebel to see feminist takes like “Women are fucking idiots who can’t make important decisions until they’re at least 26.”