The requirements are as follows:
The requirements are as follows:
No.... No, man...Shit, no man. I believe you’d get your ass kicked driving somethin like that, man.
A Jeep Renegade perhaps? Seems to check all the boxes, and it offers funky colors to go with the somewhat funky styling, and you can take the roof panels off for fresh air cruises with your doggies.
Driving in Japan or Australia, I’ve noticed many visitors signal with their wipers.
On another article somebody said Ferrari did it so the stalk wouldn’t interfere/get confused with the paddle shifters.
Sounds to me like he got fed up with it after possibly getting fleeced by a shitty mechanic.
When I was in college and my CEL came on, I had a parts store pull the code, confirmed it wasn’t catastrophic (O2 sensor), and fixed it with black electrical tape like every broke person should do until I had a little extra money and somewhere to work on it. These are important experiences in college.
I still own one of those LR3s. That 4.4 is a Jaguar engine, not a Ford, but it and the transmission have been bulletproof. It’s the various sensors, lower control arm replacements, suspension air compressor, gasoline (About 12 mpg in the city. 91 octane only) and the tires that have really added up over the years. I’m…
Donks and Squatters are definitely not my thing, but this law fails the Footloose Test. Clearly the law exists because people hate the look and, maybe, the people driving these trucks. Otherwise it would have been written differently. Show me some empirical evidence of a safety issue and we can talk.
Oh, give me a break. Is this like people complaining anything with less than 300 hp is just dog-ass slow?
What about a Forester? OP could get a Sport or Limited for <$30k.