Specifically the 32 Ford Roadster. I don't think I've ever seen a stock one in person, only in photos. Even if you Google "32 Ford Roadster Stock" 90% of the photos will be of street rods.

Well, the US gave GM, GMAC and Chrysler tons of money. They still fucked up.

The fact that Honda didn't take bailout money while they ignored the problem I'm sure is very comforting to the kids who watched their mother bleed to death.

What does that have to do with their hiding a safety problem?

Neutral: Why Not Anti-Honda Outrage? What's the difference between GM and Honda here?

Where's the outrage over this? You should be raging.

Harrison Ford is close enough, no? :)

Neutral: Can We Drive Our Way Out Of Our Problems? Or is Bill Ford right? Do we need multiple transit solutions? What should those be?

Only brings the MPG up to 18 as an AVERAGE. that means a high of 19 highway and a low of 9 city. So a V8 Grand Cherokee is my guess.

Dude who the fuck told you all those lies?

The Prius is the iPhone of the car world. No matter how well-matched (or even superior) a competitor product is, it's worthless without the high profile name. Toyota defined the hybrid market, and anything that differs from Toyota's ideologies fails to meet people's expectations of a hybrid.

More than that, I'd make damn sure her insurance rates go up. If she's going to be that clueless, hit her in the pocketbook, let her learn her lesson that way.

A couple observations on subprime car loans from inside the car business:

Wait - A roll of paper towls is $0.83, or about $0.02 per sheet. A diaper is about $0.22. So unless the mess is a requires over 10 sheets of paper towls, it doent make sense.

It's probably up there stealing the Russian's space geckos. #gogetthosegeckos

Those breaks require lining people's pockets and kissing pinky rings. Many corporate tax breaks are so narrow they only apply to one company.

If the majority of their board was based in the UK then they would not have a problem. It's a bizarre bit of international tax law that deems that a company is deemed to be based where the majority of it's board members are resident. not where the revenues are generated.

It's clear that Obama championed the bailout, but where does it say Obama sanctioned the inversion transaction?

You mean, you'll put down your rock and I'll put down my sword, and we'll try and kill each other like civilized people?