shocontinental
shocontinental
shocontinental

Something is missing in the reporting. If they already were standing why would anyone be asking them to stand? 

I did a 3 week camping trip in the rockies this summer and spent a few of those nights in mixed-use campgrounds. Of all the RVs in the campground only a small percentage of them did not have a solar array on the roof, and/or on ground mounts. It looked like many people had 1-2kW of solar. When it came time for dinner,

I’m okay with this, I actually hate generators while camping.

All of the tunnels are still exactly where you remember them. I’ve seen some fans complain that the canopy of trees overhead doesn’t cover as much of the view above as it used to, making this forest feel less, well, deep. But that was sort of unrealistic from an environmental standpoint to begin with, and PS1 and

So in other words, checking for a sticker is pointless because the advice either way is to throw them out.

Because there could be a sticker that indicates the onion came from elsewhere.

Too bad we can’t sue dealers for wasting our time. The way I see it, they owe you at least a couple hundred dollars. 

Yeah I’m not surprised it isn’t consistent. I know individual licenses are how it works in CA and at least a few other states.

How am I going to get sick when I’ve just been tying these onions to my belt, which has been the style for some time now?

Wow, that’s a lot of Land Cruisers.

Toyota somehow did it.

Toyota says Oh, hell no! to Chevy having the ugliest truck in the world honors and declares war!

It will distract you from thinking about metal fatigue in the fan blades while watching the in-flight movie miles above the icy waters of the Atlantic.

I think it’s important to ask him if he has something like an S-Corp set up. That would lessen his tax burden a bit. I understand saying you’re not an accountant, but imo it is a weak excuse. To readers, it comes off as if you didn’t look into state taxes in CA with a simple website or look up the cut Twitch gets in

“It’s his math, not mine.”

I’d argue the same note as dragonfliet —- but also add that the way that the article is written is matter-of-fact and not always quoting the person.

Christ on a stick, I feel like Simon Pegg in Hot Fuzz yelling “You’re a detective. Detect!” Admittedly a lot of this article is very detailed and interesting, especially about Twitch’s insane cut and how he’s paying his moderators and about his decent views on paying taxes. I’m glad I found all that out.

“I’m a reporter, not an accountant”

Then maybe don’t publish an article until you can verify the tax amounts? It seems really irresponsible to write an article that’s just “person makes bold claim!” It’s like publishing an article “Trump says millions of votes were fraudulent” with no follow up (yes I know plenty of outlets did that, but it was bad)