It’s always a pity if kotaku puts up articles that miss half the information. Did the rest of his team comment? What did they say? what did the female say about it and who is she at all? Was she some kind of supermodel and was she offended? It doesn’t change that the behavior of that dude is just dumb but as it…

Because their sponsors want to be visible?

I’m stoked for the eventual Super Saiyan Mahogany Goku, and his wood-grain ki aura.

Ah, this year’s edition of “Halloween is problematic, time to be offended by everything”. Its must be exhausting to be on the lookout for things to be offended by 24/7. Do you crowdsource your outrage search or do you all have a fire watch schedule and take turns being on the lookout for things that might be…

Yeah, they just said there was MORE anime out there that was more of what they would prefer.

I think because people hear this argument often, and it tends to be a Motte and Bailey. This and this is wrong/sexist/problematic, but we aren’t actually *saying* ban it!

To be fair, anime treats everybody pretty bad.

The very definition of online dating.

1. Be Attractive or be female

You realize Tinder exists to find you the most desirable human right?

Its ALWAYS the ugly one.

as long as I stop getting those useless group photos where you don’t know which person’s profile it is. Usually it’s the ugly one.

How is that creepy? It’s just analytics and it provides a better experience for users of the app.

Win-win?

I don’t like the direction this series is taking...

The existence (or lack) of profit doesn’t constitute Fair Use.

She knows how to play the game, but she forgot to read the appendix. There’s a little more to it than looking pretty and shaking your ass.

It’s almost as if people shouldn’t be using other people’s IPs as a means for their entire online identity and branding...

So that’s why not Zoidberg.