shmuga9
shmuga9
shmuga9

As I recall they actually did a lot of fabrication. That was why I watched the show. The son did actually have building skills and they did actually build bikes.

Yeah that line ranks up with “no one can love you until you love yourself” and is kind of mean-spirited if you think about it the right way. Like dude I hate myself and I still have friends.

B-b-b-ut she’s wearing glasses and she’s not in a skirt or dress. If Hollywood has taught me anything, it’s an unattainable standard of acceptable beauty.

(But seriously, a person could get lost in those eyes.)


The way you get a partner is that you become someone worth dating, TaJDS — not through sub Tucker-Max bullshit.

Rachael Leigh Cook is not an ugly girl, header image!

When I was in college, the people with the longest, in depth “artist statements” usually had the worst projects because they were lazy or didn’t have the skill to back up their grand speeches. I get this feeling here.

Sorry, it is a myth and you’re an idiot

And companies institute a system (negotiation) that accounts for agreeableness in determining wages. The system thus discriminates based on gender.

You literally just outlined a rationale for gender discrimination based on the quality of agreeableness.

“Stealing what you’re owed and destroying everything else”

Gender pay gap has been 100% debunked. People just need to read a little to understand it.

Is there an alternate path where they simply ask for a raise? That could lead to choices like: “Don’t go to jail” and “Find a job where you’re more appreciated.”

This game is dumb.

it would be super punk if the game made you start with a more intensive but lucrative college degree, work on average 5 hours more each week (unpaid), at a job that you were nine times more likely to die at, in possibly more physical and less appealing career (garbageperson! long haul trucker!), saw your family less

“It’s unpolished, but artfully unpolished, like a patch-studded jacket.”

oh, so It’s a fantasy game about imaginary world where gender pay gap myth is a reality.

You hope that he’s learned that 40 years ago, during the sexual revolution, he should not have owned a waterbed or a copy of The Joy of Sex (for some reason noted in the Glixel article)? You hope that he’s learned some thing about how in 1976 he invited a woman into a hot tub, and when she refused, he didn’t do

I’m sorry, but when will it be the right year? I don’t care about the award as much as I care about the fact that his actions are haunting him for 40 years later. Nobody should have to go through that, especially for the things he did. It’s not like he force-fed his cock into someone’s mouth. Even the statement about

That’s the real trick, here. The bar is raised. He was a sexist pig in an era where being a sexist pig wasn’t really something you called out. Nobody told you you shouldn’t think that way. It was even encouraged. Do we hold our founding fathers responsible for their slave ownership? It’s easy to say they should have