shazirah
Ria
shazirah

I don’t really care about the boobies. I do hate cancer, though.

Excellent point. Additionally, women have far more medical expenses and potential complications from cancers. Very happy Blizzard partnered with this charity which itself is highly rated among charities for how it gives as much as it can with minimal overhead to the cause it champions. My ma in law is a survivor as

One in eight women will develop breast cancer at some point in their life. In comparison, one in 250 men will develop testicular cancer. It needs the focus because it’s an enormous, ever-present threat to a shockingly large percentage of the population.

You are forgiven.

How is he thinking hard?? As someone who’s in 3D modeling, those details are wonderful to see and take note of. Perhaps you should start thinking more?

I really like the small details Blizzard does to these characters. Like the fact she has two moles on her back and one oh her left shoulder.

I mean she’s a created CGI character, they could have easily gaven her “perfect” skin but nope, even her skin has character.

Just based off of the other comments I’m curious, am I the only one who enjoyed all of the reading in PoE 1? :o

As someone who plays almost exclusively Mercy, I’m totally okay with this. They needed to make a change to give her PotG more often, as often even something like a 4-man rez would lose out to a couple kills. They swung the pendulum way too hard in the other direction though. I got PotG earlier today for a one person

There was a patch a week or so ago that made Mercy PotG everytime there was a Mercy rez, including single rezzes. I agree we need more Mercy PotG’s but not like this.

This. It’s almost every other match.

Every time Mercy is in a match with me and gets more than a two man rez since the last patch.

There’s a lot of commenters on here that are praying for your demise. Just want to say there’s plenty of people that do not wish that in any way and that indeed support your decisions as a union. Ethics are incredibly important and the fact that mistakes have happened in the past does not mean you have to be doomed

I mean, Nintendo still makes great games with it’s properties and Sega hasn’t made a great Sonic game in years.

It really should be mentioned that the whole “vote against the Demcorats” thing was about a specific Democrat (who was buddied up with that disgrace of a prosecutor they have) who was actually worse on the issues facing the county at the time than the Republican. In fact, in that county executive race the Dem nearly

Yeah, otherwise you would come off like an asshole.

We are not talking about every possible act of violence against a male character that could be shown in a movie, while expecting female characters to never encounter any violence. Note that there is no complaint about any other kind of violence the woman in the movie experiences. This article is about this particular

yeah... the whole “I’m not a rapist because I’m not putting my dick in her” shtick has got to go. Did she say “yeah, put that baster in me!! I want it!” (or something to that effect) No? It’s rape dude.

I love horror/thriller movies. They are my favorite genre. But, like many women, I’ve been sexually assaulted. It’s hard to find a good horror movie that does not involve the sexual assault of a woman. I’m not sure why; it’s such a lazy ass trope that is used entirely too often.

Jewel’s response is lovely:

Regarding the reaction to getting hit with rounds, when someone is really shot with a shot gun or any gun (other than perhaps a cannon), they don’t go flying back, that is only in movies/cartoons. Since shooters started going for more realistic ballistics, the enemies had to react in the appropriate way. Some of this